these are ibm x336,
dual 3ghz processors, 4bg ram, but they fall apart at 20 users. w2k3 r2. sp2. ps 4.5 adv.
they think they should get more users per server. so do i.
i am suspicious of the app setup on one of the apps. and they have a lot of symantec junk installed. plus all the tricerat stuff. simplify profiles, printing, reliability etc.
dual 3ghz processors, 4bg ram, but they fall apart at 20 users. w2k3 r2. sp2. ps 4.5 adv.
they think they should get more users per server. so do i.
i am suspicious of the app setup on one of the apps. and they have a lot of symantec junk installed. plus all the tricerat stuff. simplify profiles, printing, reliability etc.
On Sun, Aug 31, 2008 at 9:20 PM, <steveg@thinclient.net> wrote:
Exactly, some blades for example do this just as is done on lower end desktops with integrated video chipsets......Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
From: "Joe Shonk" <joe.shonk@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:14:11 -0700
To: <thin@freelists.org>
Subject: [THIN] Re: ramBecause the system is sucking up a bunch of it before the OS starts (PCI-X, video, etc)… You can get some of it back by using the /PAE switch (yes, even on standard) to map that memory back.
Joe
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Greg Reese
Sent: Sunday, August 31, 2008 7:01 PM
To: Thin
Subject: [THIN] ram
why would a server have 4096mb of ram installed but only report 3455mb installed? i am looking over some servers for a friend of mine and this seems odd.
No comments:
Post a Comment