[THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

True- think of this…..on a virtualization host we are seeing 16GB to 32GB of RAM, 64 GB is just around the corner and with CPU core density going up we are probably only a generation or two of servers away from a mid priced 8-16 core server with 64GB of RAM, so maybe it is sooner than we think!

 

I have a hard time imagining a 64GB RAM workstation, but then again, if you store your data on a solid state drive you would get to 64GB real fast and beyond….. I hear we should expect inexpensive solid state disks in 2009, so again, it might all be sooner then we think!!

 

So why exactly do we need anything more than 640K? My first Citrix servers were 90 Mhz machines with something 8MB RAM and we got about 12 users or so. Now you load a VDI virtualization host and with max ram you might get 20 or users- what’s up with that???

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 

---

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Berny Stapleton
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 9:28 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Hey, laugh now. I thought at one point that 64MB would be tonnes, I now sit here with 4GB of RAM in my PC and I still hit swap.

Give it 20 years and a terrabyte of RAM wouldn't seem all that out of the picture. I don't think we will be at the point of virtual reality desktop, but what we will do with the information, and how we access it I think will certainly change.

Berny

2008/6/27 Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk>:

corrected :p

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Steve Greenberg
Sent: 27 June 2008 15:52

To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Why would anyone ever need more than 640 GB of RAM?  J

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 

---

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Wood
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 5:44 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Its probably because it takes more than 640K to run

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: 27 June 2008 12:52
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Wow sort of symbolic that they release it on the day Bill Gates leaves.

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Andy Friar <Andy.Friar@novus.co.uk> wrote:

Slightly OT but Hyper-V released.

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950050

 

Rgds

 

Andy

 

 

[THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

Hey, laugh now. I thought at one point that 64MB would be tonnes, I now sit here with 4GB of RAM in my PC and I still hit swap.

Give it 20 years and a terrabyte of RAM wouldn't seem all that out of the picture. I don't think we will be at the point of virtual reality desktop, but what we will do with the information, and how we access it I think will certainly change.

Berny

2008/6/27 Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk>:

corrected :p

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Steve Greenberg
Sent: 27 June 2008 15:52

To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Why would anyone ever need more than 640 GB of RAM?  J

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 

---

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Wood
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 5:44 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Its probably because it takes more than 640K to run

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: 27 June 2008 12:52
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Wow sort of symbolic that they release it on the day Bill Gates leaves.

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Andy Friar <Andy.Friar@novus.co.uk> wrote:

Slightly OT but Hyper-V released.

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950050

 

Rgds

 

Andy

 

[THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

Nice!

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 

---

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Wood
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 8:45 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

corrected :p

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Steve Greenberg
Sent: 27 June 2008 15:52
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Why would anyone ever need more than 640 GB of RAM?  J

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 

---

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Wood
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 5:44 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Its probably because it takes more than 640K to run

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: 27 June 2008 12:52
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Wow sort of symbolic that they release it on the day Bill Gates leaves.

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Andy Friar <Andy.Friar@novus.co.uk> wrote:

Slightly OT but Hyper-V released.

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950050

 

Rgds

 

Andy

 

[THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

corrected :p

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Steve Greenberg
Sent: 27 June 2008 15:52
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Why would anyone ever need more than 640 GB of RAM?  J

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 

---

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Wood
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 5:44 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Its probably because it takes more than 640K to run

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: 27 June 2008 12:52
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Wow sort of symbolic that they release it on the day Bill Gates leaves.

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Andy Friar <Andy.Friar@novus.co.uk> wrote:

Slightly OT but Hyper-V released.

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950050

 

Rgds

 

Andy

 

[THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

Ø       Wow sort of symbolic that they release it on the day Bill Gates leaves. >

 

That is actually more than a little freaky isn’t it considering that mainstream virtualization really is the first big paradigm change in a long time! It could be nothing, but it also could be a very significant when we look back in a few years… stay tuned…..

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

[THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

Why would anyone ever need more than 640 MB of RAM?  J

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 

---

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Wood
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 5:44 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Its probably because it takes more than 640K to run

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: 27 June 2008 12:52
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Wow sort of symbolic that they release it on the day Bill Gates leaves.

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Andy Friar <Andy.Friar@novus.co.uk> wrote:

Slightly OT but Hyper-V released.

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950050

 

Rgds

 

Andy

 

[THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

BOB!

 

---

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jason Patten
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 10:06 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

What MS product doesn't take more than that these days?

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

Its probably because it takes more than 640K to run

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: 27 June 2008 12:52
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Wow sort of symbolic that they release it on the day Bill Gates leaves.

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Andy Friar <Andy.Friar@novus.co.uk> wrote:

Slightly OT but Hyper-V released.

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950050

 

Rgds

 

Andy

 

--
Woody Allen  - "I am not afraid of death, I just don't want to be there when it happens."

This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete or destroy the message. Thank you.

[THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

What MS product doesn't take more than that these days?

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 8:44 AM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

Its probably because it takes more than 640K to run

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: 27 June 2008 12:52
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Wow sort of symbolic that they release it on the day Bill Gates leaves.

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Andy Friar <Andy.Friar@novus.co.uk> wrote:

Slightly OT but Hyper-V released.

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950050

 

Rgds

 

Andy

 

--
Woody Allen  - "I am not afraid of death, I just don't want to be there when it happens."

[THIN] Re: RDP console session into Citrix VMware Guest

It's not just Vista and 2008 you need the /admin switch... The latest XP client needs it too.

Joe

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Mike Semon <msemon@ont.com> wrote:

No, I am aware of with Vista and Windows 2008 you need the /admin. It is
strange because if I log onto the guest with the VMware console it shows
That I am connected with the console session under TSadmin, however, when
I connect with the /console from RDP I just get the session#. Not sure it
This is reporting problem or issue with VMware.

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf

Of Andrew Wood
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:51 AM
To: thin@freelists.org

Subject: [THIN] Re: RDP console session into Citrix VMware Guest

Its not something simple like you're connecting with vista - where its mstsc
/admin rather than mstsc /console?

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf
Of msemon@ont.com
Sent: 26 June 2008 21:04
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] RDP console session into Citrix VMware Guest

Have a stange type of issue. When I try to RDP into a Citrix server (VM)
with console option it shows up as a normal session. This happens whether I
use remote desktops or
 /console option. Guest OS is W2K3 R2. I am seeing thsi on more than one
VM. Anyone seen any strangeness when using RDP into VM's?


Mike

--------------------------------------------------------------------

mail2web.com - MicrosoftR Exchange solutions from a leading provider -

http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange


************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************



************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************

[THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

Its probably because it takes more than 640K to run

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: 27 June 2008 12:52
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

 

Wow sort of symbolic that they release it on the day Bill Gates leaves.

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Andy Friar <Andy.Friar@novus.co.uk> wrote:

Slightly OT but Hyper-V released.

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950050

 

Rgds

 

Andy

 

[THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

no kidding.

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 6:51 AM, Jim Kenzig <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Wow sort of symbolic that they release it on the day Bill Gates leaves.

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Andy Friar <Andy.Friar@novus.co.uk> wrote:

Slightly OT but Hyper-V released.

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950050

 

Rgds

 

Andy

[THIN] Re: Hyper-V Released

Wow sort of symbolic that they release it on the day Bill Gates leaves.

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Andy Friar <Andy.Friar@novus.co.uk> wrote:

Slightly OT but Hyper-V released.

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950050

 

Rgds

 

Andy

[THIN] Re: RDP console session into Citrix VMware Guest

No, I am aware of with Vista and Windows 2008 you need the /admin. It is
strange because if I log onto the guest with the VMware console it shows
That I am connected with the console session under TSadmin, however, when
I connect with the /console from RDP I just get the session#. Not sure it
This is reporting problem or issue with VMware.

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf
Of Andrew Wood
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 4:51 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: RDP console session into Citrix VMware Guest

Its not something simple like you're connecting with vista - where its mstsc
/admin rather than mstsc /console?

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf
Of msemon@ont.com
Sent: 26 June 2008 21:04
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] RDP console session into Citrix VMware Guest

Have a stange type of issue. When I try to RDP into a Citrix server (VM)
with console option it shows up as a normal session. This happens whether I
use remote desktops or
/console option. Guest OS is W2K3 R2. I am seeing thsi on more than one
VM. Anyone seen any strangeness when using RDP into VM's?

Mike

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web.com - MicrosoftR Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************

[THIN] SAP Gui install question

Hi,

 

I am about to roll out the new SAPGUI 7.1 and when I create a package using SAP package server it sets the variable SapFrontEndDir =  %ProgramFiles%\SAP\FrontEnd.

 

Is there an easy way to make this install to the D:\ rather than the C:\ I have tried a few options but cant get the syntax correct.

 

thanks

Ronnie

Visit our website : www.ltai.ie

__________________________________________

Lufthansa Technik Airmotive Ireland Limited. Registered in Ireland. Reg. No. 45999. Registered Office: Naas Road, Rathcoole, Co.Dublin.

Lufthansa Technik Airmotive Ireland Leasing Limited. Registered in Ireland. Reg. No. 140891. Registered Office: Naas Road, Rathcoole, Co.Dublin.

__________________________________________

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please advise by return email and delete all copies of the message.

[THIN] Re: RDP console session into Citrix VMware Guest

Its not something simple like you're connecting with vista - where its mstsc
/admin rather than mstsc /console?

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf
Of msemon@ont.com
Sent: 26 June 2008 21:04
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] RDP console session into Citrix VMware Guest

Have a stange type of issue. When I try to RDP into a Citrix server (VM)
with console option it shows up as a normal session. This happens whether I
use remote desktops or
/console option. Guest OS is W2K3 R2. I am seeing thsi on more than one
VM. Anyone seen any strangeness when using RDP into VM's?

Mike

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web.com - MicrosoftR Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************

[THIN] Hyper-V Released

Slightly OT but Hyper-V released.

 

http://support.microsoft.com/kb/950050

 

Rgds

 

Andy

[THIN] RDP console session into Citrix VMware Guest

Have a stange type of issue. When I try to RDP into a Citrix server (VM)
with console option it shows up as a normal session. This happens whether I
use remote desktops or
/console option. Guest OS is W2K3 R2. I am seeing thsi on more than one
VM. Anyone seen any strangeness when using RDP into VM's?

Mike

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web.com - Microsoft® Exchange solutions from a leading provider -
http://link.mail2web.com/Business/Exchange

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************

[THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 4.5.1 question

Any hotfixes installed on SG 3.0? Hotfix 2 or later is required if installing WI and SG on same server.

 

What IP is the non-default site listening on? Create a HOSTS file entry for the site's FQDN and enter the local IP.

 

Run the SG wizard and pick advanced. On the WI page, uncheck "installed on this computer" and enter the FQDN of the WI website. Check box next to "Secure" and uncheck box next to "Default Port". Then enter 444 as the port.

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 12:53 PM, cherie.watts Watts <cherie.watts@gmail.com> wrote:

I have the FQDN for the WI Gateway settings and I have the default access method set to "Gateway Direct". In the configure CSG wizard, I have been accepting the default of "Indirect" and leaving "Installed on this computer" enabled. As I do want the users to enter in the url of the secure gateway....and WI is installed locally.

 

I will go search through more doco.

 

:)

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Steve Greenberg <steveg@thinclient.net> wrote:

Sorry, I don't have a CSG install handy to look at. There are two pieces- WI has to have it's DMZ setting to talk in gateway mode to the CSG with the FQDN of the CSG which is the outside public name not the WI site name. Then CSG should have a link value to where it forward to the WI but I don't know which screen that would be on….

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 

---

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of cherie.watts Watts
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:57 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 4.5.1 question

 

Hi Steve

 

OK, oops on the subject, I meant WI 4.5.1.

 

When you are referring to the value for CSG...do mean this particular screen!! (Attached snap)

 

I have entered the WI address https://blsecure.bl.uk:444/Citrix/AccessPlatform, can't find server.

Tried https://blsecure.bl.uk/Citrix/AccessPlatform no luck either

 

This is all on my testlan.

 

 Thanks for the help

 

 

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Steve Greenberg <steveg@thinclient.net> wrote:

What value are you putting in on the CSG for the Web Interface? If you only put the server name or ip address it will launch the default site on IIS. You may have to specify the full path, in the newer web interface it is

 

Servername/Citrix/AccessPlatform

 

I don't remember what 3.51 one was exactly, but something like

 

Servername/Citrix/Metaframe/WebInterface

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 

---

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of cherie.watts Watts
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:46 AM

To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question

 

Hi Everyone

 

I have just about driven myself crazy trying to configure these.

 

I have no problems connecting with Secure Gateway if Web Interface is installed into the Default website on the IIS server. But if I create it in a new website in IIS and set Web Interface site etc... This all works from the Web Interface links. But Secure Gateway persists in opening the iistart.htm in the default website.

 

I am not sure if it is a config problem in Web Interface or Secure Gateway..

 

What am I doing wrong or not doing?? Please help

 

Thanks

Cherie

 

[THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 4.5.1 question

I have the FQDN for the WI Gateway settings and I have the default access method set to "Gateway Direct". In the configure CSG wizard, I have been accepting the default of "Indirect" and leaving "Installed on this computer" enabled. As I do want the users to enter in the url of the secure gateway....and WI is installed locally.

 

I will go search through more doco.

 

:)

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Steve Greenberg <steveg@thinclient.net> wrote:

Sorry, I don't have a CSG install handy to look at. There are two pieces- WI has to have it's DMZ setting to talk in gateway mode to the CSG with the FQDN of the CSG which is the outside public name not the WI site name. Then CSG should have a link value to where it forward to the WI but I don't know which screen that would be on….

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 

---

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of cherie.watts Watts
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 8:57 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 4.5.1 question

 

Hi Steve

 

OK, oops on the subject, I meant WI 4.5.1.

 

When you are referring to the value for CSG...do mean this particular screen!! (Attached snap)

 

I have entered the WI address https://blsecure.bl.uk:444/Citrix/AccessPlatform, can't find server.

Tried https://blsecure.bl.uk/Citrix/AccessPlatform no luck either

 

This is all on my testlan.

 

 Thanks for the help

 

 

On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Steve Greenberg <steveg@thinclient.net> wrote:

What value are you putting in on the CSG for the Web Interface? If you only put the server name or ip address it will launch the default site on IIS. You may have to specify the full path, in the newer web interface it is

 

Servername/Citrix/AccessPlatform

 

I don't remember what 3.51 one was exactly, but something like

 

Servername/Citrix/Metaframe/WebInterface

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 

---

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of cherie.watts Watts
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 4:46 AM

To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Secure Gateway 3.0 and Web Interface 3.5.1 question

 

Hi Everyone

 

I have just about driven myself crazy trying to configure these.

 

I have no problems connecting with Secure Gateway if Web Interface is installed into the Default website on the IIS server. But if I create it in a new website in IIS and set Web Interface site etc... This all works from the Web Interface links. But Secure Gateway persists in opening the iistart.htm in the default website.

 

I am not sure if it is a config problem in Web Interface or Secure Gateway..

 

What am I doing wrong or not doing?? Please help

 

Thanks

Cherie