Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kenzig
Twitter: http://twitter.com/InternetPilot
The only entry in the Run registry key is for a debug tool written in house to try and diagnose this issue. Obviously the issue was occuring before we wrote this tool and added the entry.
Interesting that you say that it is more reliable to hard code the folder redirction into the profile. Unfortunatley we need to have the concpt of roaming profiles to support some of our apps which write config into the users profile which must persist between logons. Also the profile location differs dependin upon the group membership of the user.
When you found gpo folder redirection unreliable how did you detect this? Through the users folder not being directed to the correct location or gpo events logged? It is very strange that Resultant Set of Policy says the GPO was applied and even gives the correct paths.
I have looked at flex profiles in the past - looks like a nice solution - but trying to avoid the extra work if possible!
Once again thanks for all the ideas...
Regards
Will
________________________________________
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Greg Reese
Sent: 21 March 2009 12:46
To: Thin
Subject: [THIN] Re: Vanilla 2008 Terminal Server Logon Issue [Virus Scanned] [Spam score:8%]
I have always found it more reliable to hard code the folder
redirections into the user's profile rather than rely on the folder
redirection gpo.
Have you looked at ten flex profile kit from LoginConsultants?
Greg
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 21, 2009, at 6:20 AM, Mr W Laidlaw <W.Laidlaw@wittonpark.blackburn.sch.uk
> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Long time lurker - but this is my first post...
>
> We have a number of x64 2008 Terminal Servers Vanilla (ie not Citrix
> etc).
>
> Occasionally when users logon a number of things don't work:
> Folder redirection
> Regkeys in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows
> \CurrentVersion\Run are ignored
> Some 32-bit applications won't run.
>
> This only happens sometimes, usually everything works as expected.
>
> If the user is affected if they log off and immediately back on
> usually this fixes everything.
> Nothing unusual is logged in the event log and Group Policy Results
> in GPMC shows that group policy is being correctly applied.
>
>
> Has anyone got any ideas or seen anything similar before?
>
> All thoughts welcome!
>
> Many thanks
>
> Will
>
> --
> Will Laidlaw
> IT Support
> Witton Park High School
> DDI: 01254 686164
> Fax: 01254 686178
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
> Follow ThinList on Twitter
> http://twitter.com/thinlist
> Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
> http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
> Thinlist MOBILE Feed
> http://thinlist.net/mobile
> ************************************************
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
Thinlist MOBILE Feed
http://thinlist.net/mobile
************************************************************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
Thinlist MOBILE Feed
http://thinlist.net/mobile
************************************************
Joe
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf
Of Mr W Laidlaw
Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2009 4:20 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Vanilla 2008 Terminal Server Logon Issue [Virus Scanned]
Hi All,
Long time lurker - but this is my first post...
We have a number of x64 2008 Terminal Servers Vanilla (ie not Citrix etc).
Occasionally when users logon a number of things don't work:
Folder redirection
Regkeys in
HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run
are ignored
Some 32-bit applications won't run.
This only happens sometimes, usually everything works as expected.
If the user is affected if they log off and immediately back on usually this
fixes everything.
Nothing unusual is logged in the event log and Group Policy Results in GPMC
shows that group policy is being correctly applied.
Has anyone got any ideas or seen anything similar before?
All thoughts welcome!
Many thanks
Will
--
Will Laidlaw
IT Support
Witton Park High School
DDI: 01254 686164
Fax: 01254 686178
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
Thinlist MOBILE Feed
http://thinlist.net/mobile
************************************************
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
Thinlist MOBILE Feed
http://thinlist.net/mobile
************************************************
Have you looked at ten flex profile kit from LoginConsultants?
Greg
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 21, 2009, at 6:20 AM, Mr W Laidlaw <W.Laidlaw@wittonpark.blackburn.sch.uk
> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Long time lurker - but this is my first post...
>
> We have a number of x64 2008 Terminal Servers Vanilla (ie not Citrix
> etc).
>
> Occasionally when users logon a number of things don't work:
> Folder redirection
> Regkeys in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows
> \CurrentVersion\Run are ignored
> Some 32-bit applications won't run.
>
> This only happens sometimes, usually everything works as expected.
>
> If the user is affected if they log off and immediately back on
> usually this fixes everything.
> Nothing unusual is logged in the event log and Group Policy Results
> in GPMC shows that group policy is being correctly applied.
>
>
> Has anyone got any ideas or seen anything similar before?
>
> All thoughts welcome!
>
> Many thanks
>
> Will
>
> --
> Will Laidlaw
> IT Support
> Witton Park High School
> DDI: 01254 686164
> Fax: 01254 686178
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
> Follow ThinList on Twitter
> http://twitter.com/thinlist
> Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
> http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
> Thinlist MOBILE Feed
> http://thinlist.net/mobile
> ************************************************
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
Thinlist MOBILE Feed
http://thinlist.net/mobile
************************************************
Long time lurker - but this is my first post...
We have a number of x64 2008 Terminal Servers Vanilla (ie not Citrix etc).
Occasionally when users logon a number of things don't work:
Folder redirection
Regkeys in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Wow6432Node\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Run are ignored
Some 32-bit applications won't run.
This only happens sometimes, usually everything works as expected.
If the user is affected if they log off and immediately back on usually this fixes everything.
Nothing unusual is logged in the event log and Group Policy Results in GPMC shows that group policy is being correctly applied.
Has anyone got any ideas or seen anything similar before?
All thoughts welcome!
Many thanks
Will
--
Will Laidlaw
IT Support
Witton Park High School
DDI: 01254 686164
Fax: 01254 686178
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
Thinlist MOBILE Feed
http://thinlist.net/mobile
************************************************
On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Doug Rooney <Doug@sonomatilemakers.com> wrote:
Will this one work??? ß This is the sarcasm J (In regards to IE-8)
Where I work, IE is not allowed, we use Mozilla Firefox, does anyone know of a way on a remote session using MSTSC to restrict Firefox to one website only?
We have Wyse Winterms spread throughout our factories and we have to restrict Internet access to keep people off of non-business sites, but this one terminal is in the shipping building and needs to have access to one trucking company, DTS. No I have successfully stopped Internet access on the terminals that do not need Internet access, but this one does, but only for the one site. Any Ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Now 2 people answered with good suggestions, but I will take all the input anyone has.
Thanks again.
~Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Manager
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
(707) 837-8177 X11
(707) 837-9472 FAX
it@sonomatilemakers.com
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Greg Reese
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 6:08 PM
To: Thin
Subject: [THIN] Re: Need Help
I don't see it either doug. Repost. Sarcasm and all.
Greg
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 19, 2009, at 7:54 PM, "Joe Shonk" <joe.shonk@gmail.com> wrote:I don't see the original message in my history. It's possible nobody saw it.
Joe
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Doug Rooney
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 12:34 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Need Help
So, just curious, if I had left out the sarcasm, would anyone have offered any suggestions?
Thank You
~Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Manager
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
(707) 837-8177 X11
(707) 837-9472 FAX
it@sonomatilemakers.com
I believe you can. What you'd have to do is setup a profile with the website that you'd like to access and save that firefox profile.
It's early here in the east coast, so my brain hasn't kicked in just yet. But i believe you can do something like "firefox.exe -P "profilename" - %some other strings%
Don't take my word has i've never done this before.So, basically, it's an educated guess. =)
HTHOn Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 9:05 AM, Doug Rooney <Doug@sonomatilemakers.com> wrote:
Will this one work??? ß This is the sarcasm J (In regards to IE-8)
Where I work, IE is not allowed, we use Mozilla Firefox, does anyone know of a way on a remote session using MSTSC to restrict Firefox to one website only?
We have Wyse Winterms spread throughout our factories and we have to restrict Internet access to keep people off of non-business sites, but this one terminal is in the shipping building and needs to have access to one trucking company, DTS. No I have successfully stopped Internet access on the terminals that do not need Internet access, but this one does, but only for the one site. Any Ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Now 2 people answered with good suggestions, but I will take all the input anyone has.
Thanks again.
~Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Manager
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
(707) 837-8177 X11
(707) 837-9472 FAX
it@sonomatilemakers.com
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Greg Reese
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 6:08 PM
To: Thin
Subject: [THIN] Re: Need Help
I don't see it either doug. Repost. Sarcasm and all.
Greg
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 19, 2009, at 7:54 PM, "Joe Shonk" <joe.shonk@gmail.com> wrote:I don't see the original message in my history. It's possible nobody saw it.
Joe
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Doug Rooney
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 12:34 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Need Help
So, just curious, if I had left out the sarcasm, would anyone have offered any suggestions?
Thank You
~Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Manager
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
(707) 837-8177 X11
(707) 837-9472 FAX
it@sonomatilemakers.com
That only installation. You still have to create a Policy in the PSMC to define who can shadow who. Also for what you want, you need to modify the ICA properties to set that option. (tscc.exe)
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Chris Strug
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 6:08 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Unattended install parameters - shadow logging
Hi All,
Have one of those "Friday" moment and for the life of me can't get my head round the way I need to configure the install parameters for an unattended install.
I want to "Allow shadowing of user sessions on server" with a popup acceptance prompt and all shadow sessions to be logged.
I'm currently using:
CTX_MF_SHADOWING_CHOICE=Yes
CTX_MF_SHADOW_PROHIBIT_REMOTE_ICA=No
CTX_MF_SHADOW_PROHIBIT_NO_NOTIFICATION=No
CTX_MF_SHADOW_PROHIBIT_NO_LOGGING=No
But am having problems getting what I want...
Anyone tell me what I need to set these to? I just can't get my head round the logic...
Thanks
Chris.
--
-
chrisstrug@gmail.com
Will this one work??? ß This is the sarcasm J (In regards to IE-8)
Where I work, IE is not allowed, we use Mozilla Firefox, does anyone know of a way on a remote session using MSTSC to restrict Firefox to one website only?
We have Wyse Winterms spread throughout our factories and we have to restrict Internet access to keep people off of non-business sites, but this one terminal is in the shipping building and needs to have access to one trucking company, DTS. No I have successfully stopped Internet access on the terminals that do not need Internet access, but this one does, but only for the one site. Any Ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Now 2 people answered with good suggestions, but I will take all the input anyone has.
Thanks again.
~Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Manager
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
(707) 837-8177 X11
(707) 837-9472 FAX
it@sonomatilemakers.com
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Greg Reese
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 6:08 PM
To: Thin
Subject: [THIN] Re: Need Help
I don't see it either doug. Repost. Sarcasm and all.
Greg
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 19, 2009, at 7:54 PM, "Joe Shonk" <joe.shonk@gmail.com> wrote:I don't see the original message in my history. It's possible nobody saw it.
Joe
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Doug Rooney
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 12:34 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Need Help
So, just curious, if I had left out the sarcasm, would anyone have offered any suggestions?
Thank You
~Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Manager
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
(707) 837-8177 X11
(707) 837-9472 FAX
it@sonomatilemakers.com
That only installation. You still have to create a Policy in the PSMC to define who can shadow who. Also for what you want, you need to modify the ICA properties to set that option. (tscc.exe)
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Chris Strug
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 6:08 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Unattended install parameters - shadow logging
Hi All,
Have one of those "Friday" moment and for the life of me can't get my head round the way I need to configure the install parameters for an unattended install.
I want to "Allow shadowing of user sessions on server" with a popup acceptance prompt and all shadow sessions to be logged.
I'm currently using:
CTX_MF_SHADOWING_CHOICE=Yes
CTX_MF_SHADOW_PROHIBIT_REMOTE_ICA=No
CTX_MF_SHADOW_PROHIBIT_NO_NOTIFICATION=No
CTX_MF_SHADOW_PROHIBIT_NO_LOGGING=No
But am having problems getting what I want...
Anyone tell me what I need to set these to? I just can't get my head round the logic...
Thanks
Chris.
--
-
chrisstrug@gmail.com
Its random so you have to force it to be static.
Joe
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of James Scanlon
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 10:13 PM
To: Thin
Subject: [THIN] Re: Citrix License Server - Firewall
I have found this article http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX103356
It mentions changing the citrix daemon port which all seems easy enough, but what i dont understand is how the connecting server (requesting the license) knows the new port to it is to converse on?? or does the LMGRD send this detail after the initial contact?
Thanks again!
James
From: joe.shonk@gmail.com
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Citrix License Server - Firewall
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:03:38 -0700
Not sure about the AG, but the other products also connect on a high port. This can be set statically on the license server.
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of James Scanlon
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 9:59 PM
To: Thin
Subject: [THIN] Citrix License Server - Firewall
Greetings List Champions!
Hopefully here is another easy one.
We are trying to get our Access Gateway 4.5.7 to talk to our inside citrix license server.
Setup:
Internet Firewall > Access Gateway > DMZ Firewall > License Server
Naively I assumed that it would be as easy as opening TCP port 27000 on Firewall2 into the license server? End of story..
We have currently just opened TCP 27000 from AG to License Server without any success thus far...
Is there a reverse rule that will need to be allowed for the return traffic from the license server to the AG?
Cheers
James
Explore the new Windows Live. Looking for a place to manage all your online stuff?
Find car news, reviews and more Looking to change your car this year?
Will this one work??? ß This is the sarcasm J (In regards to IE-8)
Where I work, IE is not allowed, we use Mozilla Firefox, does anyone know of a way on a remote session using MSTSC to restrict Firefox to one website only?
We have Wyse Winterms spread throughout our factories and we have to restrict Internet access to keep people off of non-business sites, but this one terminal is in the shipping building and needs to have access to one trucking company, DTS. No I have successfully stopped Internet access on the terminals that do not need Internet access, but this one does, but only for the one site. Any Ideas?
Thanks in advance.
Now 2 people answered with good suggestions, but I will take all the input anyone has.
Thanks again.
~Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Manager
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
(707) 837-8177 X11
(707) 837-9472 FAX
it@sonomatilemakers.com
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Greg Reese
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 6:08 PM
To: Thin
Subject: [THIN] Re: Need Help
I don't see it either doug. Repost. Sarcasm and all.
Greg
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 19, 2009, at 7:54 PM, "Joe Shonk" <joe.shonk@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't see the original message in my history. It's possible nobody saw it.
Joe
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Doug Rooney
Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2009 12:34 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Need Help
So, just curious, if I had left out the sarcasm, would anyone have offered any suggestions?
Thank You
~Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Manager
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
(707) 837-8177 X11
(707) 837-9472 FAX
it@sonomatilemakers.com
Hello Russell,
Thanks for your great help,
I have one more question, how add the san storage to vmware EXSI server. Because I’ new for SAN J
Thanks & Regards,
Shiva Shankar S |
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Russell Robertson
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 5:56 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
Shiva
Apologies, you need to uninstall the patch PSE400W2K3R06 if you don’t have access to the license server. Based on the fact now that you seem to be having other problems, this is probably the best course of action for you to take.
Cheers
Russell
Russell Robertson | Virtual Stream | T:01224 580970 | M:07881 922 745 | Microsoft, Citrix and VMware advisers |
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Shankar, Shiva
Sent: 20 March 2009 09:38
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
Hello Russell,
Thanks for info, Do you have any idea how to rollup the hotfix this is solution left for me. Please advice
Thanks & Regards,
Shiva Shankar S | Senior System Engineer, Asia Pacific
phone +65 6511 9241 | Fax +65 6274 9930
3 Harbourfront Place | #08-03 HarbourFront Tower
sshankar@carlsonwagonlit.com | www.carlsonwagonlit.com
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Russell Robertson
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 5:33 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
I would think you have two options;
· If you can do this, check the version of the license server and review Jeremy’s previous post about port numbers – if you have a firewall between your Citrix servers and your license server, ensure the Citrix server is checking the right port for the license server – you can use Telnet to check open ports;
· Uninstall the hotfix rollup – although I’ve never been a fan of doing this, it might be your only option.
Cheers
Russell
Russell Robertson | Virtual Stream | Microsoft, Citrix and VMware advisers |
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Shankar, Shiva
Sent: 20 March 2009 09:19
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
Hello Russell,
No, because I can’t upgrade the license server because this license server not in our country.
What should we need to do to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Shiva Shankar S | Senior System Engineer, Asia Pacific
phone +65 6511 9241 | Fax +65 6274 9930
3 Harbourfront Place | #08-03 HarbourFront Tower
sshankar@carlsonwagonlit.com | www.carlsonwagonlit.com
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Russell Robertson
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 5:17 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
Hi Shiva
Did you upgrade your license server to 11.5 before installing the hotfix rollup?
Cheers
Russell
Russell Robertson | Virtual Stream | Microsoft, Citrix and VMware advisers |
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Shankar, Shiva
Sent: 20 March 2009 09:09
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
Hello,
I applied the patch on our citrix PS 4 server , the patch which I applied is PSE400W2K3R06 after restarting server I’m receiving error message “Metaframe Presentation Server cannot contact the license server IP address”
Please advice
Thanks & Regards,
Shiva Shankar S
Shiva
Apologies, you need to uninstall the patch PSE400W2K3R06 if you don’t have access to the license server. Based on the fact now that you seem to be having other problems, this is probably the best course of action for you to take.
Cheers
Russell
Russell Robertson | Virtual Stream | T:01224 580970 | M:07881 922 745 | Microsoft, Citrix and VMware advisers |
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Shankar, Shiva
Sent: 20 March 2009 09:38
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
Hello Russell,
Thanks for info, Do you have any idea how to rollup the hotfix this is solution left for me. Please advice
Thanks & Regards,
Shiva Shankar S | Senior System Engineer, Asia Pacific
phone +65 6511 9241 | Fax +65 6274 9930
3 Harbourfront Place | #08-03 HarbourFront Tower
sshankar@carlsonwagonlit.com | www.carlsonwagonlit.com
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Russell Robertson
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 5:33 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
I would think you have two options;
· If you can do this, check the version of the license server and review Jeremy’s previous post about port numbers – if you have a firewall between your Citrix servers and your license server, ensure the Citrix server is checking the right port for the license server – you can use Telnet to check open ports;
· Uninstall the hotfix rollup – although I’ve never been a fan of doing this, it might be your only option.
Cheers
Russell
Russell Robertson | Virtual Stream | Microsoft, Citrix and VMware advisers |
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Shankar, Shiva
Sent: 20 March 2009 09:19
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
Hello Russell,
No, because I can’t upgrade the license server because this license server not in our country.
What should we need to do to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Shiva Shankar S | Senior System Engineer, Asia Pacific
phone +65 6511 9241 | Fax +65 6274 9930
3 Harbourfront Place | #08-03 HarbourFront Tower
sshankar@carlsonwagonlit.com | www.carlsonwagonlit.com
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Russell Robertson
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 5:17 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
Hi Shiva
Did you upgrade your license server to 11.5 before installing the hotfix rollup?
Cheers
Russell
Russell Robertson | Virtual Stream | Microsoft, Citrix and VMware advisers |
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Shankar, Shiva
Sent: 20 March 2009 09:09
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
Hello,
I applied the patch on our citrix PS 4 server , the patch which I applied is PSE400W2K3R06 after restarting server I’m receiving error message “Metaframe Presentation Server cannot contact the license server IP address”
Please advice
Thanks & Regards,
Shiva Shankar S
Hello Russell,
Thanks for info, Do you have any idea how to rollup the hotfix this is solution left for me. Please advice
Thanks & Regards,
Shiva Shankar S | Senior System Engineer, Asia Pacific
phone +65 6511 9241 | Fax +65 6274 9930
3 Harbourfront Place | #08-03 HarbourFront Tower
sshankar@carlsonwagonlit.com | www.carlsonwagonlit.com
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Russell Robertson
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 5:33 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
I would think you have two options;
· If you can do this, check the version of the license server and review Jeremy’s previous post about port numbers – if you have a firewall between your Citrix servers and your license server, ensure the Citrix server is checking the right port for the license server – you can use Telnet to check open ports;
· Uninstall the hotfix rollup – although I’ve never been a fan of doing this, it might be your only option.
Cheers
Russell
Russell Robertson | Virtual Stream | Microsoft, Citrix and VMware advisers |
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Shankar, Shiva
Sent: 20 March 2009 09:19
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
Hello Russell,
No, because I can’t upgrade the license server because this license server not in our country.
What should we need to do to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Shiva Shankar S | Senior System Engineer, Asia Pacific
phone +65 6511 9241 | Fax +65 6274 9930
3 Harbourfront Place | #08-03 HarbourFront Tower
sshankar@carlsonwagonlit.com | www.carlsonwagonlit.com
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Russell Robertson
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 5:17 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
Hi Shiva
Did you upgrade your license server to 11.5 before installing the hotfix rollup?
Cheers
Russell
Russell Robertson | Virtual Stream | Microsoft, Citrix and VMware advisers |
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Shankar, Shiva
Sent: 20 March 2009 09:09
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
Hello,
I applied the patch on our citrix PS 4 server , the patch which I applied is PSE400W2K3R06 after restarting server I’m receiving error message “Metaframe Presentation Server cannot contact the license server IP address”
Please advice
Thanks & Regards,
Shiva Shankar S
I would think you have two options;
· If you can do this, check the version of the license server and review Jeremy’s previous post about port numbers – if you have a firewall between your Citrix servers and your license server, ensure the Citrix server is checking the right port for the license server – you can use Telnet to check open ports;
· Uninstall the hotfix rollup – although I’ve never been a fan of doing this, it might be your only option.
Cheers
Russell
Russell Robertson | Virtual Stream | Microsoft, Citrix and VMware advisers |
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Shankar, Shiva
Sent: 20 March 2009 09:19
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
Hello Russell,
No, because I can’t upgrade the license server because this license server not in our country.
What should we need to do to resolve this issue.
Thanks & Regards,
Shiva Shankar S | Senior System Engineer, Asia Pacific
phone +65 6511 9241 | Fax +65 6274 9930
3 Harbourfront Place | #08-03 HarbourFront Tower
sshankar@carlsonwagonlit.com | www.carlsonwagonlit.com
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Russell Robertson
Sent: Friday, March 20, 2009 5:17 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
Hi Shiva
Did you upgrade your license server to 11.5 before installing the hotfix rollup?
Cheers
Russell
Russell Robertson | Virtual Stream | Microsoft, Citrix and VMware advisers |
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Shankar, Shiva
Sent: 20 March 2009 09:09
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] I applied is PSE400W2K3R06
Hello,
I applied the patch on our citrix PS 4 server , the patch which I applied is PSE400W2K3R06 after restarting server I’m receiving error message “Metaframe Presentation Server cannot contact the license server IP address”
Please advice
Thanks & Regards,
Shiva Shankar S