Friday, May 8, 2009

[THIN] OT: Exchange 2003

I am resending this as I am not sure it really went out.

Well, we just got let go by the people that have been helping with our Exchange Server issues, they are EST in Canada and changed their business model and we no longer fit.

So, if there is anyone on this list that does remote (or on-site) Exchange 2003 consulting that is available on an ad-hoc basis at a reasonable per hour rate, please contact me Off-List.

We are located 1 hour North of the Golden Gate.

 

Thank You

~Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Manager
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
(707) 837-8177 X11
(707) 837-9472 FAX
it@sonomatilemakers.com

 

 

[THIN] Re: slow login

Or you could just install the 2015 driver on the server.
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kenzig
Twitter: http://twitter.com/InternetPilot


On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 9:11 AM, Jason Patten <jasoncitrix@gmail.com> wrote:
I have a customer who is experiencing a long delay (2-4 minutes) when logging in.
By playing with the Citrix policy I have narrowed it down to the single printer he has installed on his machine, an HP LaserJet P2015DN PCL 5.
The printer is attached locally, not networked, and is operational.
If I turn off the printer mapping the login takes only a few seconds. With the printer mapping enabled it slows to several minutes.
It is set to use the Universal driver.
Has anyone seen anything similar?  Would using the PS or PCL driver make a difference?  Or possibly mapping to an HP LaserJet 4 instead of universal

[THIN] slow login

I have a customer who is experiencing a long delay (2-4 minutes) when logging in.
By playing with the Citrix policy I have narrowed it down to the single printer he has installed on his machine, an HP LaserJet P2015DN PCL 5.
The printer is attached locally, not networked, and is operational.
If I turn off the printer mapping the login takes only a few seconds. With the printer mapping enabled it slows to several minutes.
It is set to use the Universal driver.
Has anyone seen anything similar?  Would using the PS or PCL driver make a difference?  Or possibly mapping to an HP LaserJet 4 instead of universal

Thursday, May 7, 2009

[THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

Indeed – and v1 of the app receiver supports CSG – and two factor authentication – both of which everyone should have if they’ve pushed access to their citrix farm to the interwebnet

 

I’ve not tried alternative SSLVPNs mind  - that could be a fun way to waste a Sunday :?

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch
Sent: 06 May 2009 18:47
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

 

PNA can go through CSG.

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Jason Patten <jasoncitrix@gmail.com> wrote:

Currently we ONLY use WI / CSG and doesn't PN agent require more open ports on the firewall?   Currently we ONLY allow 80/443 traffic except for some specific FTP and other specialized programs and we lock those to specific addresses.
To enable this I'd have to argue a case to open up our firewall even further.   CSG/WI would be useful if worked.



On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

Erm – why would you want that?

 

Your delivery mechanism for pnagent is essentially the same  as WI – so adding in PNAgent at the backend isn’t going to be a major pain for you. For your iphone users on the other hand having to enter the WI details every time is going to be cumbersome – the PNagent model means there’s a lighter interface to handle; and possibly it was a bit easier to code...

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jan
Sent: 06 May 2009 15:47
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

 

So will this thing ever work with just plain Web Interface?

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

Jinx

 

;)

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms
Sent: 05 May 2009 15:31
To: THIN
Subject: [THIN] The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

 

The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store! http://fleck.com/ykXvG
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kenzig
Twitter: http://twitter.com/InternetPilot

 

 

 

[THIN] Re: GPOs not always applying

If you don’t get a direct response, try http://www.gpoguy.com/GPTalk-Subscribe.aspx

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Steve Snyder
Sent: 07 May 2009 02:44
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] GPOs not always applying

 

w2k3, domain still at w2k for some odd-reason. Anyway, my GPOs don't seem to always apply to my test user (me) account - when it doesn't, when you run gpresult you get "user does not have RSOP data". You can logoff/logon again and then get it applied just fine - same DC both times.

Any ideas where to look first?



SUBJECT TO CONTRACT

Wednesday, May 6, 2009

[THIN] GPOs not always applying

w2k3, domain still at w2k for some odd-reason. Anyway, my GPOs don't seem to always apply to my test user (me) account - when it doesn't, when you run gpresult you get "user does not have RSOP data". You can logoff/logon again and then get it applied just fine - same DC both times.

Any ideas where to look first?

[THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

that doc viewer is the cool piece of the iphone stuff that isn't getting much attention.

just saw a demo in the keynote where they streamed outlook and access to a mac.  very cool.

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 12:47 PM, Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@gmail.com> wrote:
PNA can go through CSG.

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Jason Patten <jasoncitrix@gmail.com> wrote:
Currently we ONLY use WI / CSG and doesn't PN agent require more open ports on the firewall?   Currently we ONLY allow 80/443 traffic except for some specific FTP and other specialized programs and we lock those to specific addresses.
To enable this I'd have to argue a case to open up our firewall even further.   CSG/WI would be useful if worked.



On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

Erm – why would you want that?

 

Your delivery mechanism for pnagent is essentially the same  as WI – so adding in PNAgent at the backend isn't going to be a major pain for you. For your iphone users on the other hand having to enter the WI details every time is going to be cumbersome – the PNagent model means there's a lighter interface to handle; and possibly it was a bit easier to code...

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jan
Sent: 06 May 2009 15:47
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

 

So will this thing ever work with just plain Web Interface?

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

Jinx

 

;)

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms
Sent: 05 May 2009 15:31
To: THIN
Subject: [THIN] The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

 

The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store! http://fleck.com/ykXvG
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kenzig
Twitter: http://twitter.com/InternetPilot

 




[THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

PNA can go through CSG.

On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Jason Patten <jasoncitrix@gmail.com> wrote:
Currently we ONLY use WI / CSG and doesn't PN agent require more open ports on the firewall?   Currently we ONLY allow 80/443 traffic except for some specific FTP and other specialized programs and we lock those to specific addresses.
To enable this I'd have to argue a case to open up our firewall even further.   CSG/WI would be useful if worked.



On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

Erm – why would you want that?

 

Your delivery mechanism for pnagent is essentially the same  as WI – so adding in PNAgent at the backend isn't going to be a major pain for you. For your iphone users on the other hand having to enter the WI details every time is going to be cumbersome – the PNagent model means there's a lighter interface to handle; and possibly it was a bit easier to code...

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jan
Sent: 06 May 2009 15:47
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

 

So will this thing ever work with just plain Web Interface?

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

Jinx

 

;)

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms
Sent: 05 May 2009 15:31
To: THIN
Subject: [THIN] The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

 

The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store! http://fleck.com/ykXvG
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kenzig
Twitter: http://twitter.com/InternetPilot

 



[THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

In order for PN Agent to work, all you really need is 443.

You have the architecture in place to already support a fully secure PN Agent implementation. (WI/CSG)

You're just going to have to configure your version of WI to support for PN Agent.



On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Jason Patten <jasoncitrix@gmail.com> wrote:
Currently we ONLY use WI / CSG and doesn't PN agent require more open ports on the firewall?   Currently we ONLY allow 80/443 traffic except for some specific FTP and other specialized programs and we lock those to specific addresses.
To enable this I'd have to argue a case to open up our firewall even further.   CSG/WI would be useful if worked.



On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

Erm – why would you want that?

 

Your delivery mechanism for pnagent is essentially the same  as WI – so adding in PNAgent at the backend isn't going to be a major pain for you. For your iphone users on the other hand having to enter the WI details every time is going to be cumbersome – the PNagent model means there's a lighter interface to handle; and possibly it was a bit easier to code...

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jan
Sent: 06 May 2009 15:47
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

 

So will this thing ever work with just plain Web Interface?

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

Jinx

 

;)

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms
Sent: 05 May 2009 15:31
To: THIN
Subject: [THIN] The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

 

The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store! http://fleck.com/ykXvG
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kenzig
Twitter: http://twitter.com/InternetPilot

 



[THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

Currently we ONLY use WI / CSG and doesn't PN agent require more open ports on the firewall?   Currently we ONLY allow 80/443 traffic except for some specific FTP and other specialized programs and we lock those to specific addresses.
To enable this I'd have to argue a case to open up our firewall even further.   CSG/WI would be useful if worked.


On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

Erm – why would you want that?

 

Your delivery mechanism for pnagent is essentially the same  as WI – so adding in PNAgent at the backend isn't going to be a major pain for you. For your iphone users on the other hand having to enter the WI details every time is going to be cumbersome – the PNagent model means there's a lighter interface to handle; and possibly it was a bit easier to code...

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jan
Sent: 06 May 2009 15:47
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

 

So will this thing ever work with just plain Web Interface?

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

Jinx

 

;)

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms
Sent: 05 May 2009 15:31
To: THIN
Subject: [THIN] The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

 

The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store! http://fleck.com/ykXvG
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kenzig
Twitter: http://twitter.com/InternetPilot

 


[THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

But it's not good for remote access. No need to add another point of exposed.

You don't have to enter credentials everytime. Give it a try. 

Joe

Sent from my iPhone

On May 6, 2009, at 10:00 AM, "Andrew Wood" <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

Erm – why would you want that?

 

Your delivery mechanism for pnagent is essentially the same  as WI – so adding in PNAgent at the backend isn't going to be a major pain for you. For your iphone users on the other hand having to enter the WI details every time is going to be cumbersome – the PNagent model means there's a lighter interface to handle; and possibly it was a bit easier to code...

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jan
Sent: 06 May 2009 15:47
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

 

So will this thing ever work with just plain Web Interface?

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

Jinx

 

;)

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms
Sent: 05 May 2009 15:31
To: THIN
Subject: [THIN] The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

 

The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store! http://fleck.com/ykXvG
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kenzig
Twitter: http://twitter.com/InternetPilot

 

[THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

Erm – why would you want that?

 

Your delivery mechanism for pnagent is essentially the same  as WI – so adding in PNAgent at the backend isn’t going to be a major pain for you. For your iphone users on the other hand having to enter the WI details every time is going to be cumbersome – the PNagent model means there’s a lighter interface to handle; and possibly it was a bit easier to code...

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jan
Sent: 06 May 2009 15:47
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

 

So will this thing ever work with just plain Web Interface?

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

Jinx

 

;)

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms
Sent: 05 May 2009 15:31
To: THIN
Subject: [THIN] The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

 

The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store! http://fleck.com/ykXvG
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kenzig
Twitter: http://twitter.com/InternetPilot

 

[THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

So will this thing ever work with just plain Web Interface?

On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

Jinx

 

;)

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms
Sent: 05 May 2009 15:31
To: THIN
Subject: [THIN] The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store

 

The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store! http://fleck.com/ykXvG
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kenzig
Twitter: http://twitter.com/InternetPilot


[THIN] Synergy

Hi All,

 

Synergy is going great, videos are appearing, here is part of Mark T’s keynote

 

http://www.citrix.com/tv/#video/405  (for some reason part 4 and 5 are up, I assume the others are on the way)

 

Here is my blog entry:

 

http://thinclient.net/blog/

 

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 

\

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms
Sent: Saturday, May 02, 2009 2:57 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Audio not working from WI client sessions

 

There are 2 places where client audio gets downloaded to the client and set.  One of them is in the ICA Protocol of the "Terminal Services Configuration tool"setting on the server and the other is in the Users profile in active directoty.

 

You may also have Citrix policies that are applied to eliminate audio.  I cant remember exactly where those are applied right now.  ALSO when you publish an app I think there is something in there about audio in one of the settings so you may have to poke around in your farm settings or app settings.

 

You will want to do a change user /install on all of your servers and set the sound scheme to none.  Then do a change user /execute.   Next you want to remove all the startup wav files from the Windows/System32/Media folder so there is no startup sound when they logon (or else they will get the windows startup sound.)  After that audio should be good to go.

On Fri, May 1, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Gary Scanga <Gary.Scanga@rentacenter.com> wrote:

I'm running PS 4.0 and clients are using WI for connections. There was an email message that was broadcast to all users containing a url. When users click on the url the browser session launches fine but there is no audio.

However, when they launch a browser session from their WI page and paste in the same url, the audio works fine.

I've verified that the email application that's published is allowing audio. Not sure what/where else to look.

Thanks in advance for any help.

 

--

Gary

 

Tuesday, May 5, 2009

[THIN] Re: x64 madness

Try moving the cpl file to the non x86 folder. There is nothing magical about those x86 folders on the 64bit servers. It is purely for organization so you can keep them separate. 

Greg

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 2:58 PM, Steve Snyder <kwajalein@gmail.com> wrote:

more madness - in my GPO I restrict access to a limited selection of control panel icons, one of them being Mail, which happens to get moved into the x86 control panel icons and hence, doesn't display. Any tips?

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Steve Snyder <kwajalein@gmail.com> wrote:
Building my first x64 citrix server - w2k3, XA4.5, when I try to install HR03 I get the "you need to install visual c++ vcresidt_x86.exe first" So I did, still prompts me. Tried the x64 version for fun, it still prompts me. Can't run regmon or filmon - still poking around with the new procmon - lots to sift through.

any helpful tips?

[THIN] Re: x64 madness

more madness - in my GPO I restrict access to a limited selection of control panel icons, one of them being Mail, which happens to get moved into the x86 control panel icons and hence, doesn't display. Any tips?

On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 8:18 AM, Steve Snyder <kwajalein@gmail.com> wrote:
Building my first x64 citrix server - w2k3, XA4.5, when I try to install HR03 I get the "you need to install visual c++ vcresidt_x86.exe first" So I did, still prompts me. Tried the x64 version for fun, it still prompts me. Can't run regmon or filmon - still poking around with the new procmon - lots to sift through.

any helpful tips?

[THIN] Re: ICA rebranded HDX

I would be excited to see a new WinMo client, but I don't think it is.  The icons are the same, at least.


From: gareese@gmail.com
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: ICA rebranded HDX
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 14:38:51 -0700

It crashed on templeton during his demo too. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Rich Alexander <rich@the-alexanders.org> wrote:

Not quite ready for prime time but I'm excited to try it!

(Get an error that it can't load my profile then it kicks me out)




From: gareese@gmail.com
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: ICA rebranded HDX
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 11:37:32 -0700

Free Citrix xenapp cloud account at citrixcloud.net

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:39 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

They are also blogging live the event at http://www.citrixsynergy.com/
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:
I am following those.  Hashtag is #citrixsynergy for twitter
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
They are doing a lot with twitter. Follow Citrix_synergy and @citrixsupport

Templetom isn't speaking until 1015 pst. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:24 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Doug has an article on his site here http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=9839
But it doesn't quite mention the rebranding.  Brad did though in the video!  Keep us posted Reese.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
Dang jim. They haven't even started the keynote yet. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:05 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Ugh another name change folks.  ICA has been rebranded to HDX (High Definition User Experience) per Brad Pederson Video.





Hotmail® goes with you. Get it on your BlackBerry or iPhone.


Hotmail® goes with you. Get it on your BlackBerry or iPhone.

[THIN] Re: ICA rebranded HDX

It crashed on templeton during his demo too. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 1:35 PM, Rich Alexander <rich@the-alexanders.org> wrote:

Not quite ready for prime time but I'm excited to try it!

(Get an error that it can't load my profile then it kicks me out)




From: gareese@gmail.com
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: ICA rebranded HDX
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 11:37:32 -0700

Free Citrix xenapp cloud account at citrixcloud.net

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:39 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

They are also blogging live the event at http://www.citrixsynergy.com/
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:
I am following those.  Hashtag is #citrixsynergy for twitter
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
They are doing a lot with twitter. Follow Citrix_synergy and @citrixsupport

Templetom isn't speaking until 1015 pst. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:24 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Doug has an article on his site here http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=9839
But it doesn't quite mention the rebranding.  Brad did though in the video!  Keep us posted Reese.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
Dang jim. They haven't even started the keynote yet. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:05 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Ugh another name change folks.  ICA has been rebranded to HDX (High Definition User Experience) per Brad Pederson Video.





Hotmail® goes with you. Get it on your BlackBerry or iPhone.

[THIN] Windows 7 Release candidate publicly available

[THIN] Re: ICA rebranded HDX

Not quite ready for prime time but I'm excited to try it!

(Get an error that it can't load my profile then it kicks me out)




From: gareese@gmail.com
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: ICA rebranded HDX
Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 11:37:32 -0700

Free Citrix xenapp cloud account at citrixcloud.net

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:39 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

They are also blogging live the event at http://www.citrixsynergy.com/
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:
I am following those.  Hashtag is #citrixsynergy for twitter
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
They are doing a lot with twitter. Follow Citrix_synergy and @citrixsupport

Templetom isn't speaking until 1015 pst. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:24 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Doug has an article on his site here http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=9839
But it doesn't quite mention the rebranding.  Brad did though in the video!  Keep us posted Reese.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
Dang jim. They haven't even started the keynote yet. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:05 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Ugh another name change folks.  ICA has been rebranded to HDX (High Definition User Experience) per Brad Pederson Video.





Hotmail® goes with you. Get it on your BlackBerry or iPhone.

[THIN] Re: ICA rebranded HDX

Free Citrix xenapp cloud account at citrixcloud.net

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:39 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

They are also blogging live the event at http://www.citrixsynergy.com/
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:
I am following those.  Hashtag is #citrixsynergy for twitter
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
They are doing a lot with twitter. Follow Citrix_synergy and @citrixsupport

Templetom isn't speaking until 1015 pst. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:24 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Doug has an article on his site here http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=9839
But it doesn't quite mention the rebranding.  Brad did though in the video!  Keep us posted Reese.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
Dang jim. They haven't even started the keynote yet. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:05 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Ugh another name change folks.  ICA has been rebranded to HDX (High Definition User Experience) per Brad Pederson Video.



[THIN] Re: ICA rebranded HDX

Project independance now called xenclient it will be free. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:39 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

They are also blogging live the event at http://www.citrixsynergy.com/
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:
I am following those.  Hashtag is #citrixsynergy for twitter
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
They are doing a lot with twitter. Follow Citrix_synergy and @citrixsupport

Templetom isn't speaking until 1015 pst. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:24 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Doug has an article on his site here http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=9839
But it doesn't quite mention the rebranding.  Brad did though in the video!  Keep us posted Reese.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
Dang jim. They haven't even started the keynote yet. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:05 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Ugh another name change folks.  ICA has been rebranded to HDX (High Definition User Experience) per Brad Pederson Video.



[THIN] Re: ICA rebranded HDX

They are also blogging live the event at http://www.citrixsynergy.com/
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:
I am following those.  Hashtag is #citrixsynergy for twitter
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
They are doing a lot with twitter. Follow Citrix_synergy and @citrixsupport

Templetom isn't speaking until 1015 pst. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:24 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Doug has an article on his site here http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=9839
But it doesn't quite mention the rebranding.  Brad did though in the video!  Keep us posted Reese.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
Dang jim. They haven't even started the keynote yet. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:05 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Ugh another name change folks.  ICA has been rebranded to HDX (High Definition User Experience) per Brad Pederson Video.



[THIN] Re: ICA rebranded HDX

I am following those.  Hashtag is #citrixsynergy for twitter
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kenzig
Twitter: http://twitter.com/InternetPilot


On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
They are doing a lot with twitter. Follow Citrix_synergy and @citrixsupport

Templetom isn't speaking until 1015 pst. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:24 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Doug has an article on his site here http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=9839
But it doesn't quite mention the rebranding.  Brad did though in the video!  Keep us posted Reese.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
Dang jim. They haven't even started the keynote yet. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:05 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Ugh another name change folks.  ICA has been rebranded to HDX (High Definition User Experience) per Brad Pederson Video.


[THIN] Re: ICA rebranded HDX

They are doing a lot with twitter. Follow Citrix_synergy and @citrixsupport

Templetom isn't speaking until 1015 pst. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:24 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Doug has an article on his site here http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=9839
But it doesn't quite mention the rebranding.  Brad did though in the video!  Keep us posted Reese.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
Dang jim. They haven't even started the keynote yet. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:05 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Ugh another name change folks.  ICA has been rebranded to HDX (High Definition User Experience) per Brad Pederson Video.

[THIN] Re: ICA rebranded HDX

Doug has an article on his site here http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=9839
But it doesn't quite mention the rebranding.  Brad did though in the video!  Keep us posted Reese.
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
Dang jim. They haven't even started the keynote yet. 

Sent from my iPhone

On May 5, 2009, at 8:05 AM, "Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms" <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:

Ugh another name change folks.  ICA has been rebranded to HDX (High Definition User Experience) per Brad Pederson Video.

[THIN] Re: ICA rebranded HDX

I would prefer Speedy User eXperience. That would be more in line with my feelings about name changes.

 

Steve Raffensberger

CSG Citrix Administrator

Sovereign Bank

email: sraffens@sovereignbank.com

 


From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms
Sent: Tuesday, May 05, 2009 11:05 AM
To: THIN
Subject: [THIN] ICA rebranded HDX

 

Ugh another name change folks.  ICA has been rebranded to HDX (High Definition User Experience) per Brad Pederson Video.


This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged. Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee), you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete or destroy the message. Thank you.