Currently we ONLY use WI / CSG and doesn't PN agent require more open ports on the firewall? Currently we ONLY allow 80/443 traffic except for some specific FTP and other specialized programs and we lock those to specific addresses.
To enable this I'd have to argue a case to open up our firewall even further. CSG/WI would be useful if worked.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:
Erm – why would you want that?
Your delivery mechanism for pnagent is essentially the same as WI – so adding in PNAgent at the backend isn't going to be a major pain for you. For your iphone users on the other hand having to enter the WI details every time is going to be cumbersome – the PNagent model means there's a lighter interface to handle; and possibly it was a bit easier to code...
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jan
Sent: 06 May 2009 15:47
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store
So will this thing ever work with just plain Web Interface?
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:
Jinx
;)
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms
Sent: 05 May 2009 15:31
To: THIN
Subject: [THIN] The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store
The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store! http://fleck.com/ykXvG
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kenzig
Twitter: http://twitter.com/InternetPilot
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
[THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store
PNA can go through CSG.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Jason Patten <jasoncitrix@gmail.com> wrote:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment