So are the RDP executables the ones from MS and then Provision networks addes modules, i.e. virtual channel implementations?
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N.
Scottsdale, AZ 85266
(602) 432-8649
steveg@thinclient.net
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Michel Roth
Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2008 6:57 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: FW: Re: Performance of Citrix vs RDP for images
Yes, it's the Provision Networks client (appportal).
(sorry for butting in Rick ;-) )
On Wed, Jun 11, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Steve Greenberg <steveg@thinclient.net> wrote:
Rick,
Do you install a different RDP client package to use these additional features?
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85266
(602) 432-8649
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Rick Mack
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2008 5:48 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: FW: Re: Performance of Citrix vs RDP for images
Hi Guys,
Provision Networks have just finished the first part of their multimedia redirection enhancements to RDP. Check out the difference between standard RDP and Provission's enhanced RDP:
We've got local text echo and multimedia support right now, and will shortly have buffering for multimedia on slower links and flash redirection. Next comes progressive display and opengl support and the whole ICA vs RDP story will be irrelevant, at least it will be if you use the Provision RDP engine..
Not too bad really :-)
TS08 isn't much faster and won't be until the Callista technology gets incorporated.
regards,
Rick
--
Ulrich Mack
Quest Software
Provision Networks Division
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 5:54 AM, Nick Smith <nick@officeanyplace.com> wrote:
Anyone know if W2K8 performs better?
--
Kind Regards,
Michel Roth
Thincomputing.net
No comments:
Post a Comment