Thursday, June 12, 2008

[THIN] OT- MSAccess direction

Hello,

Sorry for the Off Topic request, but I was not sure where else to try, we are trying to do a task in MS Access that is beyond the basics, and not quite complex, if there is anyone out there will to give a little guidance please reply off-list. Thanks

 

Thank You

-Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Systems Administrator
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
(707) 837-8177 X11
(707) 837-9472 FAX
it@sonomatilemakers.com

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jan
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 2:28 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.0 question

 

In my case it was because I hate the 4.5 console. The 4.0 console works much better for me. So, I upgraded the necessary servers and left the production machines alone.

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Steve Greenberg <steveg@thinclient.net> wrote:

OK, but why not just upgrade the 4.0 servers in that case?

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Error! Filename not specified.Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 


From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jan
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 2:09 PM


To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.0 question

 

Mixing 4.0 and 4.5 is not a problem provided the datastore, data collector, and license server are running 4.5.

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 2:45 PM, Jason Patten <jasoncitrix@gmail.com> wrote:

oh.. well we have 4.5 across the board, but the 32 and 64 bit versions mixed in the farm.....

 

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 2:40 PM, Steve Greenberg <steveg@thinclient.net> wrote:

There seem to be two conversation going on at the same time. I would not mix 4.0 and 4.5 farms personally but I would mix 32 and 64 bit if the need was there….

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Error! Filename not specified.Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 


From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Chad Schneider (IT)
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 11:34 AM


To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.0 question

 

If you install 4.5, the first to be installed should be the DC's and DataStore.

 

Chad Schneider
Systems Engineer
ThedaCare IT
920-735-7615

>>> On 6/12/2008 at 1:17 PM, <DPETERSO@DINSLAW.com> wrote:

Isn't there some risk of corrupting the 4.0 data store if you do things using the 4.5 consoles? I'm doing mine separately so haven't experienced it, but that was a warning I got from Brian Cambier at MTM.

 


From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Greg Reese
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:48 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.0 question

technically, you can.  but take that with a grain of salt.  If you have trouble, the first thing you're gonna hear is that it is not a good idea.  That said, people have done it and the world didn't explode.

On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 12:44 PM, George Wasgatt <gwasgatt@gmail.com> wrote:

If we can mix & match 32 bit and 64 bit can we mix and match 4.0 and 4.5 in the same farm?

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Chad Schneider (IT)
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 1:27 PM


To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.0 question

 

That I had not seen nor heard.....

 

Chad Schneider
Systems Engineer
ThedaCare IT
920-735-7615

>>> On 6/12/2008 at 11:10 AM, <joe.shonk@gmail.com> wrote:

Citrix recommends having a separate farm for 32-bit and 64-bits servers.

Joe

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf
Of George Wasgatt
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 8:48 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.0 question

We have an existing all 32 bit 4.0 farm.  We are adding a new application
and have new 64 bit servers w/lots of memory & processors that we are
installing Citrix on.  If we went with 4.5 then would we need to set up a
separate farm?  I remember that being true for XP and earlier but don't know
if it applies to PM 4.0.  I suppose we could upgrade the 4.0 farm but we
weren't planning on that.

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf
Of Raffensberger, Stephen D
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 10:50 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Presentation Server 4.0 question

George,

The short answer is that you must use different media.

The longer answer is that Citrix has End-of-life 64 bit PS4.0. I believe
you can still download the installation media from mycitrix but you must
go to some obscure ftp site for the hotfixes.

If possible, avoid starting a new project with 64 bit 4.0.

Steve Raffensberger
Sovereign Bank Citrix Administrator
1125 Berkshire Boulevard
Wyomissing, PA 19610
Email: sraffens@sovereignbank.com

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On
Behalf Of George Wasgatt
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2008 10:39 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Presentation Server 4.0 question


Does the Presentation Server 4.0 media I've been using to install on 32
bit
Windows 2003 OS servers install on a Windows 2003 64 bit OS or is there
different media I need to download?

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.org/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.org
************************************************




This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged.
Unless you are the addressee  (or authorized to receive for the addressee),
you may not use, copy or disclose to anyone the message or any information
contained in the message.  If you have received the message in error, please
advise the sender by reply e-mail, and delete or destroy the message. Thank
you.

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.org/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.org
************************************************

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.org/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.org
************************************************

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.org/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.org
************************************************




NOTICE: This electronic mail transmission from the law firm of Dinsmore & Shohl may constitute an attorney-client communication that is privileged at law. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any unauthorized persons. If you have received this electronic mail transmission in error, please delete it from your system without copying it, and notify the sender by reply e-mail, so that our address record can be corrected.

 

 

 

No comments: