The gateway works, we’ve been using it for a while, on occasional basis. It works quite nicely, in fact, but with basically no granularity; it remains that if you’re serving our the same apps to the same people then vanilla TS works fine – for small firms, it’s great.
For anything more complex, you will probably need an add-on. Ericom provide a freebie (Then you pay if you want load-balancing features). For my money using Provision’s...umm...vWorkspace (Recently renamed) is the direction we’re going as our ‘We don’t need Citrix’ solution – does everything we need for *waaaaaayyyyyyy* less money than Citrix.
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Joe Shonk
Sent: 06 February 2009 04:29
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: TS Gateway - OT?
And it beats Citrix’s CSG by $0.00.
Citrix killer? No… There is still value that Citrix adds to Terminal Services above and beyond the stock product. For smaller customers there is AE and for Medium to Enterprise there is XenApp Enterprise and Platinum. For remote access, CSG is included in AE. For larger customers there is the CAG and AGE.
Joe
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Steve Greenberg
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 8:55 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: TS Gateway - OT?
It’s worth every penny it cost!
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453
Scottsdale, AZ 85266
(602) 432-8649
steveg@thinclient.net
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Tom Sorenson
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2009 7:40 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] TS Gateway - OT?
So it's been about a year that the MS TS Gateway has been around. I've seen zero discussion of it on this board, I'm wondering what everyone's opinion is of it and if they have tested or implemented. My architecture group seems to think it's a Citrix killer. I don't. I'm preparing my arguments now and would appreciate a sound off from the list on the subject.
Thanks all
Tom
SUBJECT TO CONTRACT
No comments:
Post a Comment