Friday, December 19, 2008

[THIN] Re: Limit 1 instance per user

Unintstall the 3001 post HRP3 fix. It breaks the "single instance"
funcionality.

Pat coughlin

On 12/19/08, Christopher Wilson <christofire@gmail.com> wrote:
> I verified there was no disconnected session. I'll have to check if the
> process could still be hung with no active or disconnected sessions.
>
> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Jason Patten <jasoncitrix@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Do they happen to have a disconnected session hanging out there somewhere?
>> Can you verify that the Process is actually terminated and not hung on the
>> server?
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Christopher Wilson <
>> christofire@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> XenApp 5 for 2003 - we have numerous apps in a new farm where the "Allow
>>> only one instance of application for each user" restriction has been set.
>>> We are finding that users are being denied login to the server with an
>>> error
>>> that they already have the application open, when it can be verified in
>>> the
>>> AMC they have zero instances of that published app running.
>>> Anyone seen this before?
>>>
>>
>>
>

--
Sent from Gmail for mobile | mobile.google.com
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
Thinlist MOBILE Feed
http://thinlist.net/mobile
************************************************

No comments: