And did you see this one? http://www.hungry-hackers.com/2008/08/gmail-account-hacking-tool.html Gmail now has a choice to make the login sessions always require SSL and it is HIGHLY recommended.
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:49 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
yep. Not good. But currently, my email is controlled by our corporate parent and they crash it about once every two weeks for an entire day or longer. So really, I would be better off. But I am still not sure I trust Google with my business.
That's why I'd rather see them make an appliance i can plug in my own network and get the same functionality but keep the data on my own disks.On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 9:32 AM, Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:
And you saw this about google apps right? http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/08/15/Google_Apps_admins_jittery_about_Gmail_hopeful_about_future-IDGNS_1.htmlOn Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:12 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
I have been running Office 07 on my Vista business PC at work too. I think both Office 2007 and Vista are giant steps backward for Microsoft. I hate the Office 2007 interface. It looks pretty, but functionally it drives me nuts.
More and more I find myself turning to Google Apps for running my appointments, contacts, and data where I can get away with it.
If they would make a Google Apps appliance that I could plug in to my network and hook to my SAN for storage, I think I would be set. My only big hangup with Google Apps is trusting my businesses data to Google.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:52 AM, Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms <jkenzig@gmail.com> wrote:
I don't know I am still very inclined to stick with Outlook 2003. I have been using Outlook 2007 locally on my Vista Business PC since it's release and testing and every time I get an update from MS (once a month) it somehow breaks Outlook 2007 and I have to run the repair utility from the CD. Very frustrating.
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 8:51 AM, JAlexander <jalexander@getoffmyplanet.us> wrote:I was kind of hoping good would overcome since I upgraded to 2007 this weekend and the display is ugly here as well. ;) Any suggestions would be welcome.----- Original Message -----From: Steve SnyderSent: Monday, August 18, 2008 9:36 PMSubject: [THIN] Re: Published Outlook 2007 is uglythe forces of evil triumphed.
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 1:31 PM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
quitter
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 8:25 PM, Steve Snyder <kwajalein@gmail.com> wrote:
yep. Unfortunately it's now a dead issue as I've rolled back to 2003 (which works fine).
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 1:09 AM, Greg Reese <gareese@gmail.com> wrote:
I think he means the application itself is 16 color.
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 3:40 AM, Andy Friar <Andy.Friar@novus.co.uk> wrote:
WI 4.6 and the latest AMC, repulish app and you'll get better colours on the icon through PNagent and WI / CSG.
Andy
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org on behalf of Steve Snyder
Sent: Sun 17/08/2008 00:06
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Published Outlook 2007 is ugly
Publishing office 2007 on w2k3 r2 w/sp2, citrix name-of-the-day 4.5, and Outlook is just ugly. As in 16-color ugly. All of the other apps, including office, look fine, and pictures embedded within an e-mail message display fine in Outlook, it's just Outlook itself is hideous.
Ideas?
No comments:
Post a Comment