Strong connectivity, including relatively low latency, is required for zone data collector/IMA communication. When sites are not linked with good connectivity they do need to be separate farms. It can be a WAN link, but it needs to be a decent one…
Steve Greenberg
Thin Client Computing
34522 N.
(602) 432-8649
steveg@thinclient.net
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of ananth padmanabham
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 10:04 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: 4.5 Datastore and Satellites
| Syn problems will have IMA service problems. We have the same problem because of WAN link replication between DS servers.... Anantha Padmanabham K
From: Long, Brett ( I work for an organization that ran an Oracle Database and 2 Citrix servers (4.0) in We had numerous issues with the IMA service starting over the sat link which caused delays getting the servers back up if there were issues.
Needless to say there has been a vast improvement in the IMA service and server response time and the users are much happier as well. Regards... Brett Long Vale Inco ( ( ( From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Steve Snyder I have a 4.5 farm using SQL for the DS, and on the other end of a satellite I have a 4.0 farm that I need to rebuild and bring up to 4.5 as well. I'd like to collapse them into one farm so I'm pondering what to do about the datastore; should I setup a SQL server at the remote site and replicate, or since 4.5 can run indefintely off of the LHC should I just have the remote server access the DS over the WAN?
Looking for thoughts, suggestions, experiences, brain farts, etc. thanks. |
Add more friends to your messenger and enjoy! Invite them now.
No comments:
Post a Comment