Thursday, March 5, 2009

[THIN] Re: older ICA clients on WI 5.0?

That's not the default setting, so someone has obviously specifically
set that. Does the ICA session start at all?

Cheers,
Jeremy.

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On
Behalf Of Gary Scanga
Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 8:41 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: older ICA clients on WI 5.0?

Good tip- didn't even know that setting existed. I found that it is an
option in v5.0 as well but, unfortunately for me, it is set to allow
*all* client versions.

Thanks,

--
Gary

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On
Behalf Of Christoph Wegener
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 5:01 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: older ICA clients on WI 5.0?

In WI 4.x you had the option to disallow client version older than 8.x
I don't know if this option is still there in WI 5.x but it would
definitely be worth to check.

Christoph

On Mar 6, 2009, at 6:42 AM, Gary Scanga wrote:

> These are thin client's that have a build on them which restricts
> users from any write access. Thus, we'd need to script an ICA client
> upgrade to all remote systems. I would assume that the Web Interface
> systems are backwards-compatible with older ICA client versions- but
> I can't find anything to validate that on Google, etc. And my
> testing is also proving otherwise :-(
>
> Thanks,
>
> --
> Gary
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org]
> On Behalf Of Joe Shonk
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 1:37 PM
> To: thin@freelists.org
> Subject: [THIN] Re: older ICA clients on WI 5.0?
>
> Should be ok.. Why not make the XenApp 11 client available on the WI
> 5.0 and
> have them update their client?
>
> Joe
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org]
> On Behalf
> Of Gary Scanga
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2009 12:25 PM
> To: 'thin@freelists.org'
> Subject: [THIN] older ICA clients on WI 5.0?
>
> I need to upgrade the Web Interface servers from version 4.0 to 5.0.
> However, I found some clients out there that are running an older
> version of
> the ICA client (7.100.21825). Does anyone know if this older version
> should
> work on v5.0 Web Interface?
>
> My quick test showed me that it may not since launching a ICA
> session did
> nothing from one of these clients.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> --
> Gary
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
> Follow ThinList on Twitter
> http://twitter.com/thinlist
> Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
> http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
> Thinlist MOBILE Feed
> http://thinlist.net/mobile
> ************************************************
>
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
> Follow ThinList on Twitter
> http://twitter.com/thinlist
> Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
> http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
> Thinlist MOBILE Feed
> http://thinlist.net/mobile
> ************************************************
> ************************************************
> For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
> set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
> http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
> Follow ThinList on Twitter
> http://twitter.com/thinlist
> Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
> http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
> Thinlist MOBILE Feed
> http://thinlist.net/mobile
> ************************************************
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>


--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
Thinlist MOBILE Feed
http://thinlist.net/mobile
************************************************
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
Thinlist MOBILE Feed
http://thinlist.net/mobile
************************************************
#####################################################################################
Confidentiality and Privilege Notice
This document is intended solely for the named addressee. The information contained in the pages is confidential and contains legally privileged information. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone, and you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you.
#####################################################################################
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
Thinlist MOBILE Feed
http://thinlist.net/mobile
************************************************

No comments: