Friday, July 25, 2008

[THIN] Re: VMM in Sept. Unbundled from SC no SA says MS Rep.

Ø       MS really wants to kick VMware in the nuts

 

Wow, MS is good at nut kicking!! This comes the very day after VMWare started positioning their value as in the management tools and not the Hypervisor. Guess what? Today MS announces their Virtual Manager will be available earlier and cheaper than first expected.

 

VMWare, consider yourself kicked in the nuts. I can only think of one company who has withstood the MS nut kick and that is Citrix, now they are buddies against a common competitor- who might that be?? VMWare !!  OUCH!!!!!!!!

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 


From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Joe Shonk
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 10:22 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: VMM in Sept. Unbundled from SC no SA says MS Rep.

 

MS really wants to kick VMware in the nuts.

 

Joe

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 9:54 AM
To: THIN; virtualize
Subject: [THIN] VMM in Sept. Unbundled from SC no SA says MS Rep.

 

[THIN] Re: Virtualizing Citrix

The balloon driver is actually called the 'Memory Control Driver', and
you can choose to not install it as part of the vmware tools. The
settings at the bottom are ESX host configuration settings, located in
'Advanced Settings' on the 'Configuration' tab of a host in Virtual
Center.

Hope this helps...ormond

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On
Behalf Of George Wasgatt
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 2:13 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Virtualizing Citrix

The tips at virtrix.blogspot.com refer to a memory ballooning driver in
VMWare tools that I can't seem to locate. I think that some of those
tips
are just a tad out of date.

And then there's this which is mostly a copy of the virtrix.blogspot
page
but with additional information at the bottom:

http://knmi.wordpress.com/best-practices-for-deploying-citrix-on-esx/

Now if I can just figure out what all that stuff at the bottom is...

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On
Behalf
Of msemon@ont.com
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 10:01 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Virtualizing Citrix

if you are virtualizing Citrix you are going to get less people on per
virtual machine. Count on about 30. Here is a link to some Citrix tips
on
VMware.

http://virtrix.blogspot.com/2007/03/vmware-best-practices-for-deploying.
html


Anyone else have some tips?

Mike


Original Message:
-----------------
From: Minero, Hector B CIV NSWCDD, K55 hector.minero@navy.mil
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:28:48 -0400
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Virtualizing Citrix



Hi all,
I see all these messages going back and forth about virtualization, but
not much information on how Citrix/TS behaves in a virtualized
environment.
A tech./sales person from Dell came yesterday and told me that I could
probably replace 7 of my PowerEdge 2850 with one beefed up PowerEdge
R900 and virtualize the 7 Citrix servers. I find that kind of hard to
believe.
Each of my 2850's can handle about 30 to 40 users concurrently. I just
don't think that an R900 could handle 200 + users with virtual Citrix
servers.

Is anyone out there using VMWare to virtualize Citrix servers in a
production environment?
What kind of hardware?
How many virtual servers per physical server?
How many users?


I would greatly appreciate your advice as I am new to VMWare.


_______________________________
Hector Minero
NSWCDD K55



--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web


************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************

-----------------------------------------
This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of
the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and
confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended
recipient or an authorized representative of the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this
communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
communication in error, notify the sender immediately by return
email and delete the message and any attachments from your system.

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************

[THIN] Re: Virtualizing Citrix

The tips at virtrix.blogspot.com refer to a memory ballooning driver in
VMWare tools that I can't seem to locate. I think that some of those tips
are just a tad out of date.

And then there's this which is mostly a copy of the virtrix.blogspot page
but with additional information at the bottom:

http://knmi.wordpress.com/best-practices-for-deploying-citrix-on-esx/

Now if I can just figure out what all that stuff at the bottom is...

-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf
Of msemon@ont.com
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 10:01 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Virtualizing Citrix

if you are virtualizing Citrix you are going to get less people on per
virtual machine. Count on about 30. Here is a link to some Citrix tips on
VMware.

http://virtrix.blogspot.com/2007/03/vmware-best-practices-for-deploying.html

Anyone else have some tips?

Mike


Original Message:
-----------------
From: Minero, Hector B CIV NSWCDD, K55 hector.minero@navy.mil
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:28:48 -0400
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Virtualizing Citrix

Hi all,
I see all these messages going back and forth about virtualization, but
not much information on how Citrix/TS behaves in a virtualized
environment.
A tech./sales person from Dell came yesterday and told me that I could
probably replace 7 of my PowerEdge 2850 with one beefed up PowerEdge
R900 and virtualize the 7 Citrix servers. I find that kind of hard to
believe.
Each of my 2850's can handle about 30 to 40 users concurrently. I just
don't think that an R900 could handle 200 + users with virtual Citrix
servers.

Is anyone out there using VMWare to virtualize Citrix servers in a
production environment?
What kind of hardware?
How many virtual servers per physical server?
How many users?


I would greatly appreciate your advice as I am new to VMWare.


_______________________________
Hector Minero
NSWCDD K55

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web


************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************

[THIN] Re: VMM in Sept. Unbundled from SC no SA says MS Rep.

MS really wants to kick VMware in the nuts.

 

Joe

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 9:54 AM
To: THIN; virtualize
Subject: [THIN] VMM in Sept. Unbundled from SC no SA says MS Rep.

 

[THIN] Re: Virtualizing Citrix

I'm getting about 30 users per VM.  I limit production VMs to 1 per core, all single CPU guests. 
 
What your rep told you can be done, but I would be nervous about the lack of anywhere for the users to go if that box goes down.
 
 
 
 
 
 

[THIN] VMM in Sept. Unbundled from SC no SA says MS Rep.

[THIN] Re: Virtualizing Citrix

I think the safe way to approach this is to NOT oversubscribe RAM and CPU. That is, take a big and powerful box and carve it up in direct relationships. I.e. if you have 8 Cores, perhaps te 4 machines with 2 CPUs each, if you have 16GB of RAM, give each of the 4 machines, 4GB. etc

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 


From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of TSguy92 Lan
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 9:35 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Virtualizing Citrix

 

TS hosted under VMware is certainly doable, however even if you can replace 7 physical boxes with one beefy ESX box, for fault tolerance purposes you should certainly consider getting more than just one ESX box, and it's worthwhile investment with multiple ESX servers to get Virtual Infrastructure as well.

Hardware still fails, and if your one beefy box goes offline taking all 7 virtual servers down, you're dead in the water. With Virtual Infrastructure, and additional ESX systems, those 7 virtual servers could auto fail over to other online ESX servers while you repair your downed hardware.

We support about 350 staff on virtualized win2k3 citrix 4.0 systems with vmware 3.5. We host these on HP Proliant BL465c G1 blades, with 4 cpus, and 16gb. At this point we're running about 10 virtual TS servers per ESX host in a 4 server vmware HA cluster, we've room to add more TS virtuals if needed.

Depending on application set, your mileage may vary.

On another note, although our virtualized TS systems have certainly served us well, changing needs in our application requirements is leading me to look more into VDI type solutions to supply our app set to our staff members. On our TS servers, our apps are fighting each other for CPU a bit too much for my liking, and we really can't silo off apps anymore than we have. So it seems to me a VDI solution where each user / app has their own isolated winxp virtual space to work from (vs a shared TS environment) may be a better fit...we'll see...just starting into the design and testing of this.

HTH

Lan



On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Minero, Hector B CIV NSWCDD, K55 <hector.minero@navy.mil> wrote:

 

Hi all,
I see all these messages going back and forth about virtualization, but not much information on how Citrix/TS behaves in a virtualized environment.

A tech./sales person from Dell came yesterday and told me that I could probably replace 7 of my PowerEdge 2850 with one beefed up PowerEdge R900 and virtualize the 7 Citrix servers.   I find that kind of hard to believe.

Each of my 2850's can handle about 30 to 40 users concurrently.   I just don't think that an R900 could handle 200 + users with virtual Citrix servers.

Is anyone out there using VMWare to virtualize Citrix servers in a production environment? 
What kind of hardware? 
How many virtual servers per physical server? 
How many users?

 

I would greatly appreciate your advice as I am new to VMWare.

 

_______________________________
Hector Minero
NSWCDD K55

 

[THIN] Re: Virtualizing Citrix

TS hosted under VMware is certainly doable, however even if you can replace 7 physical boxes with one beefy ESX box, for fault tolerance purposes you should certainly consider getting more than just one ESX box, and it's worthwhile investment with multiple ESX servers to get Virtual Infrastructure as well.

Hardware still fails, and if your one beefy box goes offline taking all 7 virtual servers down, you're dead in the water. With Virtual Infrastructure, and additional ESX systems, those 7 virtual servers could auto fail over to other online ESX servers while you repair your downed hardware.

We support about 350 staff on virtualized win2k3 citrix 4.0 systems with vmware 3.5. We host these on HP Proliant BL465c G1 blades, with 4 cpus, and 16gb. At this point we're running about 10 virtual TS servers per ESX host in a 4 server vmware HA cluster, we've room to add more TS virtuals if needed.

Depending on application set, your mileage may vary.

On another note, although our virtualized TS systems have certainly served us well, changing needs in our application requirements is leading me to look more into VDI type solutions to supply our app set to our staff members. On our TS servers, our apps are fighting each other for CPU a bit too much for my liking, and we really can't silo off apps anymore than we have. So it seems to me a VDI solution where each user / app has their own isolated winxp virtual space to work from (vs a shared TS environment) may be a better fit...we'll see...just starting into the design and testing of this.

HTH

Lan




On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 6:28 AM, Minero, Hector B CIV NSWCDD, K55 <hector.minero@navy.mil> wrote:

Hi all,
I see all these messages going back and forth about virtualization, but not much information on how Citrix/TS behaves in a virtualized environment.

A tech./sales person from Dell came yesterday and told me that I could probably replace 7 of my PowerEdge 2850 with one beefed up PowerEdge R900 and virtualize the 7 Citrix servers.   I find that kind of hard to believe.

Each of my 2850's can handle about 30 to 40 users concurrently.   I just don't think that an R900 could handle 200 + users with virtual Citrix servers.

Is anyone out there using VMWare to virtualize Citrix servers in a production environment? 
What kind of hardware? 
How many virtual servers per physical server? 
How many users?


I would greatly appreciate your advice as I am new to VMWare.


_______________________________
Hector Minero
NSWCDD K55


[THIN] IGEL firmware via USB

Hi,
 
just want to know if anyone ever tried or able to burn IGEL firmware on it's thin client via USB (No network available). I have been trying to check the available documentation but could not get it from their website.
 
Thanks
Puneet

[THIN] Re: Virtualizing Citrix

if you are virtualizing Citrix you are going to get less people on per
virtual machine. Count on about 30. Here is a link to some Citrix tips on
VMware.

http://virtrix.blogspot.com/2007/03/vmware-best-practices-for-deploying.html

Anyone else have some tips?

Mike


Original Message:
-----------------
From: Minero, Hector B CIV NSWCDD, K55 hector.minero@navy.mil
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 09:28:48 -0400
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Virtualizing Citrix

Hi all,
I see all these messages going back and forth about virtualization, but
not much information on how Citrix/TS behaves in a virtualized
environment.
A tech./sales person from Dell came yesterday and told me that I could
probably replace 7 of my PowerEdge 2850 with one beefed up PowerEdge
R900 and virtualize the 7 Citrix servers. I find that kind of hard to
believe.
Each of my 2850's can handle about 30 to 40 users concurrently. I just
don't think that an R900 could handle 200 + users with virtual Citrix
servers.

Is anyone out there using VMWare to virtualize Citrix servers in a
production environment?
What kind of hardware?
How many virtual servers per physical server?
How many users?


I would greatly appreciate your advice as I am new to VMWare.


_______________________________
Hector Minero
NSWCDD K55

--------------------------------------------------------------------
mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://link.mail2web.com/mail2web


************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************

[THIN] Re: Virtualizing Citrix

An R900 is a HEFTY box.  4 sockets, all quad-core capable, 128 GB of RAM maximum.   I'm sure the Dell person was assuming a loaded up box with all 4 processors in it and gobs of RAM, a rather expensive venture to get into all at once.  I can see that box being able to handle 200+ users depending on application.  I virtualized a few remaining Citrix servers from an old environment and it's been a smooth sailing experience.  They are very low use since it was a turndown of something no longer used, but if I get into a similar Citrix environment in the future, I'll go straight into VMware with it.
 
Downside to that kind of setup is it's a lot of eggs in one box.That setup wouldn't sit all that well with me personally.  I'd rather go with a blade setup with a lot of separate blades for similar (maybe less) money and be able to spread that love around a little.  You'll still gain environmental benefits and increase capacity at the same time, while still maintaining a level of hardware redundancy.
 
All that being said, there's nothing wrong with those PE2850's, even if they are first gen units. A couple of my primary VMware servers run on those boxes still, chowing away just dandy.

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Minero, Hector B CIV NSWCDD, K55
Sent: Friday, July 25, 2008 9:29 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Virtualizing Citrix


Hi all,
I see all these messages going back and forth about virtualization, but not much information on how Citrix/TS behaves in a virtualized environment.

A tech./sales person from Dell came yesterday and told me that I could probably replace 7 of my PowerEdge 2850 with one beefed up PowerEdge R900 and virtualize the 7 Citrix servers.   I find that kind of hard to believe.

Each of my 2850's can handle about 30 to 40 users concurrently.   I just don't think that an R900 could handle 200 + users with virtual Citrix servers.

Is anyone out there using VMWare to virtualize Citrix servers in a production environment? 
What kind of hardware? 
How many virtual servers per physical server? 
How many users?


I would greatly appreciate your advice as I am new to VMWare.


_______________________________
Hector Minero
NSWCDD K55

[THIN] Re: Virtualizing Citrix

Depending on your configuration, your application, it's load, yes, it is possible.
 
I have had servers running as virtuals, with 40-50 users per virtual.
 
Chad Schneider
Systems Engineer
ThedaCare IT
920-735-7615

>>> On 7/25/2008 at 8:28 AM, <hector.minero@navy.mil> wrote:

Hi all,
I see all these messages going back and forth about virtualization, but not much information on how Citrix/TS behaves in a virtualized environment.

A tech./sales person from Dell came yesterday and told me that I could probably replace 7 of my PowerEdge 2850 with one beefed up PowerEdge R900 and virtualize the 7 Citrix servers.   I find that kind of hard to believe.

Each of my 2850's can handle about 30 to 40 users concurrently.   I just don't think that an R900 could handle 200 + users with virtual Citrix servers.

Is anyone out there using VMWare to virtualize Citrix servers in a production environment? 
What kind of hardware? 
How many virtual servers per physical server? 
How many users?


I would greatly appreciate your advice as I am new to VMWare.


_______________________________
Hector Minero
NSWCDD K55

[THIN] Virtualizing Citrix


Hi all,
I see all these messages going back and forth about virtualization, but not much information on how Citrix/TS behaves in a virtualized environment.

A tech./sales person from Dell came yesterday and told me that I could probably replace 7 of my PowerEdge 2850 with one beefed up PowerEdge R900 and virtualize the 7 Citrix servers.   I find that kind of hard to believe.

Each of my 2850's can handle about 30 to 40 users concurrently.   I just don't think that an R900 could handle 200 + users with virtual Citrix servers.

Is anyone out there using VMWare to virtualize Citrix servers in a production environment? 
What kind of hardware? 
How many virtual servers per physical server? 
How many users?


I would greatly appreciate your advice as I am new to VMWare.


_______________________________
Hector Minero
NSWCDD K55

Thursday, July 24, 2008

[THIN] Re: VMWare to offer Free Hypervisor

He is Doug Brown, what more do you have to say. :o)

 

Joe

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 5:00 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: VMWare to offer Free Hypervisor

 

All I can say is either Doug Brown is Psychic or he knew what was up cause he posted a suggestion about this last week  http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=8155

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Harry Singh <hboogz@gmail.com> wrote:

More on this:

http://www.virtualization.info/2008/07/vmware-to-release-esx-3i-for-free-next.html





On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Steve Greenberg <steveg@thinclient.net> wrote:

Interesting now that they are positioning their product as management being the leading value J

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Error! Filename not specified.Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 


From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 3:53 PM
To: THIN; virtualize
Subject: [THIN] VMWare to offer Free Hypervisor

 

Pcworld is reporting the VMWare will offer a free low footpring version of it's ESX Hypervisor

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/148900/vmware_to_offer_lowfooprint_esx_hypervisor_free.html

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

 

 

[THIN] Re: VMWare to offer Free Hypervisor

 

Apparently, among his many other talents, Doug IS psychic!!

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 


From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 5:00 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: VMWare to offer Free Hypervisor

 

All I can say is either Doug Brown is Psychic or he knew what was up cause he posted a suggestion about this last week  http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=8155

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Harry Singh <hboogz@gmail.com> wrote:

More on this:

http://www.virtualization.info/2008/07/vmware-to-release-esx-3i-for-free-next.html





On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Steve Greenberg <steveg@thinclient.net> wrote:

Interesting now that they are positioning their product as management being the leading value J

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 


From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 3:53 PM
To: THIN; virtualize
Subject: [THIN] VMWare to offer Free Hypervisor

 

Pcworld is reporting the VMWare will offer a free low footpring version of it's ESX Hypervisor

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/148900/vmware_to_offer_lowfooprint_esx_hypervisor_free.html

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

 

 

[THIN] Re: VMWare to offer Free Hypervisor

All I can say is either Doug Brown is Psychic or he knew what was up cause he posted a suggestion about this last week  http://www.dabcc.com/article.aspx?id=8155

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Harry Singh <hboogz@gmail.com> wrote:
More on this:

http://www.virtualization.info/2008/07/vmware-to-release-esx-3i-for-free-next.html





On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Steve Greenberg <steveg@thinclient.net> wrote:

Interesting now that they are positioning their product as management being the leading value J

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 


From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 3:53 PM
To: THIN; virtualize
Subject: [THIN] VMWare to offer Free Hypervisor

 

Pcworld is reporting the VMWare will offer a free low footpring version of it's ESX Hypervisor

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/148900/vmware_to_offer_lowfooprint_esx_hypervisor_free.html

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com



[THIN] Re: VMWare to offer Free Hypervisor

More on this:

http://www.virtualization.info/2008/07/vmware-to-release-esx-3i-for-free-next.html




On Thu, Jul 24, 2008 at 7:04 PM, Steve Greenberg <steveg@thinclient.net> wrote:

Interesting now that they are positioning their product as management being the leading value J

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 


From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 3:53 PM
To: THIN; virtualize
Subject: [THIN] VMWare to offer Free Hypervisor

 

Pcworld is reporting the VMWare will offer a free low footpring version of it's ESX Hypervisor

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/148900/vmware_to_offer_lowfooprint_esx_hypervisor_free.html

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com


[THIN] Re: VMWare to offer Free Hypervisor

Interesting now that they are positioning their product as management being the leading value J

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 


From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2008 3:53 PM
To: THIN; virtualize
Subject: [THIN] VMWare to offer Free Hypervisor

 

Pcworld is reporting the VMWare will offer a free low footpring version of it's ESX Hypervisor

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/148900/vmware_to_offer_lowfooprint_esx_hypervisor_free.html

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

[THIN] VMWare to offer Free Hypervisor

Pcworld is reporting the VMWare will offer a free low footpring version of it's ESX Hypervisor

http://www.pcworld.com/businesscenter/article/148900/vmware_to_offer_lowfooprint_esx_hypervisor_free.html

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

Wednesday, July 23, 2008

[THIN] Declined: BarcampOhio

BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 12.0 MIMEDIR//EN
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:REPLY
X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=DECLINED:mailto:pmcneese@rx-ds.com
CLASS:PRIVATE
CREATED:20080724T005753Z
DTEND:20080811T213000Z
DTSTAMP:20080724T005753Z
DTSTART:20080811T140000Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20080724T005753Z
LOCATION:Dublin\, Ohio (Columbus metro area) Conference Center at OCLC.
PRIORITY:5
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:Declined: BarcampOhio
TRANSP:OPAQUE
UID:pv8ailctdfdstfarchptpphg4s@google.com
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:BUSY
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-MS-OLK-AUTOFILLLOCATION:FALSE
X-MS-OLK-CONFTYPE:0
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************

[THIN] Declined: BarcampOhio

BEGIN:VCALENDAR
PRODID:-//Microsoft Corporation//Outlook 12.0 MIMEDIR//EN
VERSION:2.0
METHOD:REPLY
X-MS-OLK-FORCEINSPECTOROPEN:TRUE
BEGIN:VEVENT
ATTENDEE;PARTSTAT=DECLINED:mailto:pmcneese@rx-ds.com
CLASS:PRIVATE
CREATED:20080724T005726Z
DTEND:20080811T213000Z
DTSTAMP:20080724T005726Z
DTSTART:20080811T140000Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20080724T005726Z
LOCATION:Dublin\, Ohio (Columbus metro area) Conference Center at OCLC.
PRIORITY:5
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:Declined: BarcampOhio
TRANSP:OPAQUE
UID:9ihqef6cf216ot2sisb38r1cuo@google.com
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-BUSYSTATUS:BUSY
X-MICROSOFT-CDO-IMPORTANCE:1
X-MS-OLK-AUTOFILLLOCATION:FALSE
X-MS-OLK-CONFTYPE:0
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR

************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************

[THIN] The Citrix Delivery Center Podcast Episode one

Barry has kicked off his podcast, check it out:

 

http://community.citrix.com/blogs/citrite/barryf/2008/07/22/The+Citrix+Delivery+Center+Podcast+-+Episode+One

 

 

Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85266

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@thinclient.net

 


From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 6:36 AM
To: THIN
Subject: [THIN] Citrix Releases Project Kensho

 

Citrix yesterday announced the release of Project Kensho a slew of Open Virtual Machine Format (OVF) Tools.
See
http://www.citrix.com/English/NE/news/news.asp?newsID=1679371&ntref=hp_article_headlines_US

Also see the Microsoft Virtualization Team blog for some additional info.

http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization/default.aspx

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

[THIN] Citrix Releases Project Kensho

Citrix yesterday announced the release of Project Kensho a slew of Open Virtual Machine Format (OVF) Tools.
See
http://www.citrix.com/English/NE/news/news.asp?newsID=1679371&ntref=hp_article_headlines_US

Also see the Microsoft Virtualization Team blog for some additional info.

http://blogs.technet.com/virtualization/default.aspx

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

[THIN] Re: Server to Client Content Redirection

Thats client->Server redirection. I think (and maybe I misunderstood) that Jan is looking for server->client redirection.
 
Tom

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 5:45 PM, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@gmail.com> wrote:

Actually this may be possible.   .FLV files can be played with the FLV Player.  If Jan publishes FLV Player and selects the extensions for the published app then she can use PNAgent to register the mime types on the client side.  The .FLV file then acts just like a .DOC or .XLS file when redirected from client to server.

 

Joe

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Tom Monahan
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 6:09 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Server to Client Content Redirection

 

For server to client. The answer is no. Server to client maintly relates to redirection internet explorer URLs to the client browser.

 

Tom


 

On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Jan <tinybeetle@gmail.com> wrote:

Is it possible to redirect file types, such as "*.flv" to the client using Citrix's Server to Client Content Redirection?

I'm running PS4.0 32bit on W2k3.

Thanks,

Jan Broucinek
Arthur Rutenberg Homes

 


Tuesday, July 22, 2008

[THIN] Re: Instant Messaging

the server piece is Wildfire or Openfire or something like that.  It's an open source jabber server.  Will run on Windows.


On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Jason Patten <jasoncitrix@gmail.com> wrote:
We use Spark IM
and run the server on a machine on our network.
It is completely internal.
Not sure of the Cost , but it may be free... At least the client is

On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Matt Kosht <matt.kosht@gmail.com> wrote:
You could roll your own IM server.  Take a look at jabber.

http://www.jabber.org/

If you have something to host a VM with.  There are plenty of free IM
jabber appliances. For example...

http://www.vmware.com/appliances/directory/248

jabber supports many different clients. Not sure how well the clients
work on TS though.









On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 2:52 PM, Minero, Hector B CIV NSWCDD, K55
> Hello all,
> I have a request for instant messaging on a network that is not connected to
> the Internet.  We would use it on PCs and Terminal Servers.
>
> Do you have any recommendation for something that would work on a standalone
> network?   I think Windows Instant Messenger requires an Internet
> connection.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> _______________________________
> Hector Minero
>
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
NEW! Follow Thin List on Twitter!
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
HOT! Thinlist MOBILE Feed!
http://thinlist.net/mobile
Thinlist quick pick
http://thinlist.net
************************************************



--
Samuel Goldwyn  - "I don't think anyone should write their autobiography until after they're dead."