Thursday, November 13, 2008

[THIN] Re: Error installing XenApp 5 on W2008

The actual error that you’ll want to look at is in the middle of the .log file at the end of the Actions section.

 

Joe

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Tim
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 8:41 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Error installing XenApp 5 on W2008

 

I'm attempting to install XenApp5 x64 Enterprise Edition on Windows 2008 x64.  Running through autorun.exe the installation of XenApp Server errors with MSI Error 1722. 

When I create a log file using this command line - msiexec /i MPS.msi /qb- /l*v C:\mps.log CTX_MF_SERVER_TYPE="E"  The tail of the log is below.

MSI (s) (30:10) [08:53:55:113]: Note: 1: 1708
MSI (s) (30:10) [08:53:55:113]: Product: Citrix XenApp 5.0 -- Installation operation failed.

MSI (s) (30:10) [08:53:55:113]: Windows Installer installed the product. Product Name: Citrix XenApp 5.0. Product Version: 5.0.0.0. Product Language: 1033. Installation success or error status: 1603.

MSI (s) (30:10) [08:53:55:129]: Cleaning up uninstalled install packages, if any exist
MSI (s) (30:10) [08:53:55:129]: MainEngineThread is returning 1603
MSI (s) (30:04) [08:53:55:129]: Destroying RemoteAPI object.
MSI (s) (30:E4) [08:53:55:129]: Custom Action Manager thread ending.
MSI (s) (30:04) [08:53:55:129]: RESTART MANAGER: Session closed.
MSI (s) (30:04) [08:53:55:129]: No System Restore sequence number for this installation.
=== Logging stopped: 11/13/2008  8:53:55 ===
MSI (c) (9C:0C) [08:53:55:160]: Decrementing counter to disable shutdown. If counter >= 0, shutdown will be denied.  Counter after decrement: -1
MSI (c) (9C:0C) [08:53:55:160]: MainEngineThread is returning 1603
=== Verbose logging stopped: 11/13/2008  8:53:55 ===

Any ideas on resolving would be appreciated.

Thanks

[THIN] Re: Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

Here are the techie guides - http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX117913 an upgrade

 

To do an OS upgrade with Citrix

 

*) Get *another* server(s)

*) put the new os on the new server(s)

*) put citrix on the new server (s)

*) put the apps on the new server (s)

*) test the server (s)

*) test the server (s)

*) test the server(s)

*) test the server(s)

*) put your users on the new server

*) repeat ad lib until v6.0

 

Feature matrix for 5.0 is here:

http://www.citrix.com/site/resources/dynamic/salesdocs/Citrix-XenApp-Comparative-Feature-Matrix-2008.pdf

 

2008 has some better performance features for Terminal Services and “stability and security” ..probably  – but from a XenApp perspective you’ll lose AIE, ActiveSync, drive remapping and Novell Integration which aren’t supported in 5.0 on 2k8- but you’ll gain Special Folder redirection, XPS Universal Printer and Preferential Load Balancing which aren’t available in w2k3...

 

hth

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
Sent: 13 November 2008 14:52
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

 

So is there a benefit to going to Windows 2008 Server for the XenApp servers.

 

And if so can that be an inplace upgrade?

 

Sorry never done an OS upgrade on a Citrix server before, only the Citrix itself.

 

 

Thanks all for your info.

 

Graeme

 

 

 

 

 

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@gmail.com> wrote:

To upgrade PS 4.5 to XenApp 5 is pretty simple.  Just following this simple step:

 

1)      Wait for it…Wait for it… Wait for it… Congratulations! Your now running XenApp 5!

2)      Update WI, ICA Client, Isolation Client as needed

 

 Citrix is getting to be lazy as they hardly put any effort into effort into XenApp 5 for Windows 2003.  The only thing that is new is an updated version of Isolation.  You could say WI is updated but a .0.1 release as WI 5 was already released with XenDesktop.  They also didn't bother to repackage and rebrand the install.  So really, XA 5 should have been a 4.6 released.

 

Joe

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:12 AM


To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

 

Hi,

 

We currently have a Citrix PS 4.5 and as part of our Citrix advantage subscriptions want to upgrade to XenApp,.

 

 

Is there any gotchas that anyone is aware of for this upgrade.

 

I understand it can be done as put disk into $.5 Server and run Setup.

 

TIA for your help

 

Graeme



--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.




--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.

[THIN] Error installing XenApp 5 on W2008

I'm attempting to install XenApp5 x64 Enterprise Edition on Windows 2008 x64.  Running through autorun.exe the installation of XenApp Server errors with MSI Error 1722. 

When I create a log file using this command line - msiexec /i MPS.msi /qb- /l*v C:\mps.log CTX_MF_SERVER_TYPE="E"  The tail of the log is below.

MSI (s) (30:10) [08:53:55:113]: Note: 1: 1708
MSI (s) (30:10) [08:53:55:113]: Product: Citrix XenApp 5.0 -- Installation operation failed.

MSI (s) (30:10) [08:53:55:113]: Windows Installer installed the product. Product Name: Citrix XenApp 5.0. Product Version: 5.0.0.0. Product Language: 1033. Installation success or error status: 1603.

MSI (s) (30:10) [08:53:55:129]: Cleaning up uninstalled install packages, if any exist
MSI (s) (30:10) [08:53:55:129]: MainEngineThread is returning 1603
MSI (s) (30:04) [08:53:55:129]: Destroying RemoteAPI object.
MSI (s) (30:E4) [08:53:55:129]: Custom Action Manager thread ending.
MSI (s) (30:04) [08:53:55:129]: RESTART MANAGER: Session closed.
MSI (s) (30:04) [08:53:55:129]: No System Restore sequence number for this installation.
=== Logging stopped: 11/13/2008  8:53:55 ===
MSI (c) (9C:0C) [08:53:55:160]: Decrementing counter to disable shutdown. If counter >= 0, shutdown will be denied.  Counter after decrement: -1
MSI (c) (9C:0C) [08:53:55:160]: MainEngineThread is returning 1603
=== Verbose logging stopped: 11/13/2008  8:53:55 ===

Any ideas on resolving would be appreciated.

Thanks

[THIN] Re: Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

Web interface 5.01 loads the apps about 10 times faster, that is the biggest  improvement.  It also does device detection now and has a mobile portal.
I posted a blog entry on my upgrade here:
 
It has links to all the files you need in mycitrix for the wi files.

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com


On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Toby <toby.percival@gmail.com> wrote:
From what has been said in the replies, is there in fact, a reason to upgrade to XenApp 5.0 at all? There is no requirement to upgrade your OS to Windows Server 2008.

Kind regards,
Toby


On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Graeme Carstairs <loonytoonz@gmail.com> wrote:
So is there a benefit to going to Windows 2008 Server for the XenApp servers.

And if so can that be an inplace upgrade?

Sorry never done an OS upgrade on a Citrix server before, only the Citrix itself.


Thanks all for your info.

Graeme






On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@gmail.com> wrote:

To upgrade PS 4.5 to XenApp 5 is pretty simple.  Just following this simple step:

 

1)      Wait for it…Wait for it… Wait for it… Congratulations! Your now running XenApp 5!

2)      Update WI, ICA Client, Isolation Client as needed

 

 Citrix is getting to be lazy as they hardly put any effort into effort into XenApp 5 for Windows 2003.  The only thing that is new is an updated version of Isolation.  You could say WI is updated but a .0.1 release as WI 5 was already released with XenDesktop.  They also didn't bother to repackage and rebrand the install.  So really, XA 5 should have been a 4.6 released.

 

Joe

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:12 AM


To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

 

Hi,

 

We currently have a Citrix PS 4.5 and as part of our Citrix advantage subscriptions want to upgrade to XenApp,.

 

 

Is there any gotchas that anyone is aware of for this upgrade.

 

I understand it can be done as put disk into $.5 Server and run Setup.

 

TIA for your help

 

Graeme



--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.




--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.


[THIN] Re: Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

From what has been said in the replies, is there in fact, a reason to upgrade to XenApp 5.0 at all? There is no requirement to upgrade your OS to Windows Server 2008.

Kind regards,
Toby

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:51 PM, Graeme Carstairs <loonytoonz@gmail.com> wrote:
So is there a benefit to going to Windows 2008 Server for the XenApp servers.

And if so can that be an inplace upgrade?

Sorry never done an OS upgrade on a Citrix server before, only the Citrix itself.


Thanks all for your info.

Graeme






On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@gmail.com> wrote:

To upgrade PS 4.5 to XenApp 5 is pretty simple.  Just following this simple step:

 

1)      Wait for it…Wait for it… Wait for it… Congratulations! Your now running XenApp 5!

2)      Update WI, ICA Client, Isolation Client as needed

 

 Citrix is getting to be lazy as they hardly put any effort into effort into XenApp 5 for Windows 2003.  The only thing that is new is an updated version of Isolation.  You could say WI is updated but a .0.1 release as WI 5 was already released with XenDesktop.  They also didn't bother to repackage and rebrand the install.  So really, XA 5 should have been a 4.6 released.

 

Joe

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:12 AM


To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

 

Hi,

 

We currently have a Citrix PS 4.5 and as part of our Citrix advantage subscriptions want to upgrade to XenApp,.

 

 

Is there any gotchas that anyone is aware of for this upgrade.

 

I understand it can be done as put disk into $.5 Server and run Setup.

 

TIA for your help

 

Graeme



--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.




--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.

[THIN] Re: Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

So is there a benefit to going to Windows 2008 Server for the XenApp servers.

And if so can that be an inplace upgrade?

Sorry never done an OS upgrade on a Citrix server before, only the Citrix itself.


Thanks all for your info.

Graeme






On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:30 PM, Joe Shonk <joe.shonk@gmail.com> wrote:

To upgrade PS 4.5 to XenApp 5 is pretty simple.  Just following this simple step:

 

1)      Wait for it…Wait for it… Wait for it… Congratulations! Your now running XenApp 5!

2)      Update WI, ICA Client, Isolation Client as needed

 

 Citrix is getting to be lazy as they hardly put any effort into effort into XenApp 5 for Windows 2003.  The only thing that is new is an updated version of Isolation.  You could say WI is updated but a .0.1 release as WI 5 was already released with XenDesktop.  They also didn't bother to repackage and rebrand the install.  So really, XA 5 should have been a 4.6 released.

 

Joe

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:12 AM


To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

 

Hi,

 

We currently have a Citrix PS 4.5 and as part of our Citrix advantage subscriptions want to upgrade to XenApp,.

 

 

Is there any gotchas that anyone is aware of for this upgrade.

 

I understand it can be done as put disk into $.5 Server and run Setup.

 

TIA for your help

 

Graeme



--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.




--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.

[THIN] Re: Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

To upgrade PS 4.5 to XenApp 5 is pretty simple.  Just following this simple step:

 

1)      Wait for it…Wait for it… Wait for it… Congratulations! Your now running XenApp 5!

2)      Update WI, ICA Client, Isolation Client as needed

 

 Citrix is getting to be lazy as they hardly put any effort into effort into XenApp 5 for Windows 2003.  The only thing that is new is an updated version of Isolation.  You could say WI is updated but a .0.1 release as WI 5 was already released with XenDesktop.  They also didn’t bother to repackage and rebrand the install.  So really, XA 5 should have been a 4.6 released.

 

Joe

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 2:12 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

 

Hi,

 

We currently have a Citrix PS 4.5 and as part of our Citrix advantage subscriptions want to upgrade to XenApp,.

 

 

Is there any gotchas that anyone is aware of for this upgrade.

 

I understand it can be done as put disk into $.5 Server and run Setup.

 

TIA for your help

 

Graeme



--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.

[THIN] Re: Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

Jim Kenzig did a video – it can be straightforward if you’re upgrading a simple implementation.

 

The issue you might find is the richness of the new WI means that corporate customisation is more of a faff than it used to be – and you’ll need to update consoles as well.

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
Sent: 13 November 2008 11:00
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

 

Thanks for your help.

 

Sounds easy, as I thought but I am always unsure when something in manuals/readmes etc sounds too easy.

 

Is there any issuws with the Web Interface, does it upgrade smoothly.

 

 

 

Graeme

 

 

On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

For Windows 2003 - apply SP3 to your 4.5 environment – deploy WI5.0.1

 

ta da - you've got XenApp 5.0

 

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
Sent: 13 November 2008 09:12
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

 

Hi,

 

We currently have a Citrix PS 4.5 and as part of our Citrix advantage subscriptions want to upgrade to XenApp,.

 

 

Is there any gotchas that anyone is aware of for this upgrade.

 

I understand it can be done as put disk into $.5 Server and run Setup.

 

TIA for your help

 

Graeme



--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.




--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.

[THIN] Re: Terminal Session security question

There is also a similar list to this – gptalk@freelists.org with some very very clever and helpful people on it.

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms
Sent: 12 November 2008 15:14
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Terminal Session security question

 

Here is what you can do with a hosts file http://www.mvps.org/winhelp2002/hosts.htm

For GPO in TS check out
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc776790.aspx
http://www.windowsnetworking.com/articles_tutorials/Terminal-Services-Group-Policy.html
http://www.msterminalservices.org/articles/Managing-Terminal-Services-Group-Policy.html
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/260370
http://www.dabcc.com/blogs/jeff/post/Blast-from-the-Past-Understanding-Group-Policy-in-a-Terminal-Services-Environment

Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Doug Rooney <Doug@sonomatilemakers.com> wrote:

Nick,

They do need to run Firefox to access the Internet, for FedEx, UPS and DHL, they also need to run many compiled Crystal Reports. They do not have e-mail, ftp and telnet are locked down at the firewall, incoming and outgoing, and the terminals have no disk drives or usable USB ports, so I think if we restrict the IPs, it will help, but I would like to do some things in the GPO, I just do not have the knowledge on how, so I don't as I do not want to totally screw up my AD. Can you recommend a resource for learning? I came from a Unix world. J

 

Thank You

-Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Systems Administrator
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
(707) 837-8177 X11
(707) 837-9472 FAX
it@sonomatilemakers.com

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Nick Smith
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 2:16 AM


To: 'thin@freelists.org'
Subject: [THIN] Re: Terminal Session security question

 

Doug,

If you allow your users to run executables they will. Via email, web, ftp, from their fat disks, hey, telnet; someone will find a way.

 

Use GPO to allow only approved executables to run and you don't need to worry about the rest.

 

I found this quite scary until I actually tried it, and then I just breathed easier.

 

Nick

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms
Sent: 11 November 2008 18:22
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Terminal Session security question

 

Nope just dhl.com will suffice.  Yeah they might be able to circumvent with an IP but if the site is set up right it should convert it to a domain and lock it out.
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 1:13 PM, Doug Rooney <Doug@sonomatilemakers.com> wrote:

Jim,

I was thinking of doing that, but for example DHL has several valid IP addresses for www.dhl.com, do I have to figure out and enter every valid possibility, and then how do I tell it everything else goes to 127.0.0.1, also if they type in an IP, I am guessing this will not work?

 

Thank You

-Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Systems Administrator
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
(707) 837-8177 X11
(707) 837-9472 FAX
it@sonomatilemakers.com

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 9:20 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Terminal Session security question

 

Use the windows hosts file to control which urls they can and can't get to. Point the rogue sites to 127.0.0.1 and they will never get there
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com

On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Doug Rooney <Doug@sonomatilemakers.com> wrote:

 

 

************************************************

 

 

 

[THIN] Re: Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

Thanks for your help.

Sounds easy, as I thought but I am always unsure when something in manuals/readmes etc sounds too easy.

Is there any issuws with the Web Interface, does it upgrade smoothly.



Graeme


On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 10:30 AM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote:

For Windows 2003 - apply SP3 to your 4.5 environment – deploy WI5.0.1

 

ta da - you've got XenApp 5.0

 

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
Sent: 13 November 2008 09:12
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

 

Hi,

 

We currently have a Citrix PS 4.5 and as part of our Citrix advantage subscriptions want to upgrade to XenApp,.

 

 

Is there any gotchas that anyone is aware of for this upgrade.

 

I understand it can be done as put disk into $.5 Server and run Setup.

 

TIA for your help

 

Graeme



--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.




--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.

[THIN] Re: Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

For Windows 2003 - apply SP3 to your 4.5 environment – deploy WI5.0.1

 

ta da - you’ve got XenApp 5.0

 

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Graeme Carstairs
Sent: 13 November 2008 09:12
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

 

Hi,

 

We currently have a Citrix PS 4.5 and as part of our Citrix advantage subscriptions want to upgrade to XenApp,.

 

 

Is there any gotchas that anyone is aware of for this upgrade.

 

I understand it can be done as put disk into $.5 Server and run Setup.

 

TIA for your help

 

Graeme



--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.

[THIN] Re: Published applications in a mixed OS environment

Hi,
 
Kixstart is brilliant but seeing as Citrix use ctxhide to hide usrlogon.cmd so there's no reason that couldn't be used to hide any other batch file.
 
regards,
 
Rick

--
Ulrich Mack
Quest Software
Provision Networks Division
On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:08 AM, TSguy92 Lan <tsguy92@gmail.com> wrote:
My work around for launching CMD files / custom scripts for starting published apps is to use Kix as the app execution script engine.

www.kixtart.org

Very robust scripting language that you can generally port DOS commands directly into.

So, the Pub App calls a CMD / BAT file which then calls to the KIX script. Just in case you can also flag the console to hide within Kix.

Since you already have the logic worked out for the Batch script. You could probably do the following:

CMD / BAT script =

@echo off

IF /I "%PROCESSOR_ARCHITECTURE%"=="AMD64" (

kix32.exe C:\scripts\64bitexcel.kix

) ELSE (

kix32.exe C:\scripts\32bitexcel.kix

)

Exit /B 0


Kix script1 = "64bitexcel.kix"

SETCONSOLE="HIDE"
RUN "%ProgramFiles(x86)%\Microsoft Office\Office12\EXCEL.EXE"

Kix script2 = "32bitexcel.kix"

SETCONSOLE="HIDE"
RUN "%ProgramFiles%\Microsoft Office\Office12\EXCEL.EXE"


All that's needed for this, would be the Kix32.exe under C:\windows\system32 on any of the TS servers which might execute it.

It would be cleaner to convert the processor identity logic into the Kix script, so that you only need 2 scripts per app (CMD just calls to a single Kix script, which checks proc types, then runs correct app), but the above should at least get you going for testing this out.

HTH

Lan


 

[THIN] Citrix upgrade from 4.5 to XenApp

Hi,

We currently have a Citrix PS 4.5 and as part of our Citrix advantage subscriptions want to upgrade to XenApp,.


Is there any gotchas that anyone is aware of for this upgrade.

I understand it can be done as put disk into $.5 Server and run Setup.

TIA for your help

Graeme


--
Carbon credits are a bit like beating someone up on this side of the world and sponsoring one of those poor starving kids on the other side of the world to make up for the fact that you're a complete shit at home.

[THIN] Re: Meta Xpe 1.0 servers showing as down in the CMC

Hi Alan,

 

You are more than welcome.

 

I’m glad you are upgrading…however, XA 4.5 is old news too…XA 5.0 for 2003 is essentially XA 4.5 feature pack 2, but would be a better starting point to allow the introduction of Windows 2008 servers into the farm, etc, as it’s not recommended to mix XA 4.5 and 5.0 servers.

 

Anyway, I know the history behind that farm, and the people that built it, so it wouldn’t surprise me if they had messed things about that stopped perfmon from running. But this shouldn’t be the case. Sometimes you just need to wait a while on the older servers. Although, depending on what you are doing, it’s never really recommended to run perfmon on the server itself. Connect via another server, or download PerfWiz from http://www.microsoft.com/downloads.

 

I’m only down the road if you ever want to catch up for a coffee and chat off the list.

 

Cheers,

Jeremy.

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of alan tropper
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 3:21 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Meta Xpe 1.0 servers showing as down in the CMC

 

Hi Jeremy,

 

Thanks for the quick reply, I will check these suggestions out.

 

I have also advised that we need to replace the current environment and we are already well under way with testing for the new XenApp 4.5 environment, however it is around a month away so I have to try to fix the current outages Im getting.

 

One last issue Im noticing on these old servers is that perfmon wont even let me add counters which is really weird????

 

Thanks for all your help with the details below, its nice that there are people like you out there to help us mortals J

 

Cheers

 

Al

 


From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Saunders
Sent: Thursday, 13 November 2008 2:51 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Meta Xpe 1.0 servers showing as down in the CMC

 

Hi Alan,

 

It sounds suspiciously like one of two issues.

1)      Memory leak or exhaustion

2)      SMB 1.0 issues

 

Issue 1 can be addressed on both W2K and W2K3 by following Microsoft TechNet article KB312362. By default, the Memory Manager tries to trim allocated paged pool memory when the system reaches 80 percent of the total paged pool. Depending on the system configuration, a possible maximum paged pool memory on a computer can be 343MB (Windows 2003 Standard) and 80 percent of this number is 274MB. If the Memory Manager is unable to trim fast enough to keep up with the demand, then you may receive event ID 2020 (The server was unable to allocate from the system paged pool because the pool was empty). But that is just one symptom.

 

By tuning the Memory Manager to start the trimming process earlier (for example, when it reaches 60 percent), it would be possible to keep up with the paged pool demand during sudden peak usage, and avoid running out of paged pool memory.

 

Microsoft will tell you that setting these values should be considered as a best practice, especially for busy servers. The optimum percentage for trimming will vary, but the default recommended setting (60%) is a good place to start.

 

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management]

"PagedPoolSize"=dword:ffffffff

"PoolUsageMaximum"=dword:0000003c

 

If the paged pool memory was running close to the edge, something like a new AV engine/pattern or MS Hotfix could have pushed it over. You can use Microsoft’s poolmon to monitor this further.

 

Issue 2 can be “managed” by monitoring some perfmon counters and then tuning out the SMB parameters as per the articles listed here:

http://www.jhouseconsulting.com/index.php/blog/2008/05/15/smb-tuning/

 

If either or both the paged pool trimming and/or SMB is really busy, it may eventually recover over time, which goes close to perhaps explaining why it sometimes fixes itself without a reboot.

 

Either way, MetaFrame XP is no longer a supported product and now 4 major product releases behind.

 

Cheers,

 

Kind regards,

Jeremy Saunders

 

Senior Solution Architect - Virtualisation Specialist |  Datacom Systems WA  |  29 Oxford Close, West Leederville, WA 6007 Australia

Email: jeremy.saunders@datacom.com.au  |  Ph: +61-8-9210-0806  | Mob: +61-413-441-846  |  Fax: +61-8-9380-4226

Personal Blog: http://www.jhouseconsulting.com/index.php

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of alan tropper
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 1:43 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Meta Xpe 1.0 servers showing as down in the CMC

 

Hi,

 

I hope someone can help me, we have 20 citrix servers in our farm and they are mixed 2000 & 2003 with a couple on VM. All servers have Meta Xpe 1.0 with latest feature release and service pack.

 

However some of the servers drop off the farm during the day and also at night, once re-booted they come back into the farm and show as up and then it happens again.

 

I have tried to re-build the problem servers LHC file but the issue is still happening, the servers processor and page file don’t seem to be too busy at the point when the servers drop off resource manager. The servers themselves stop allowing new users to log on but still maintain current connections so this points to a timeout somewhere with maybe the metric or zone server not getting a response from one of our servers in time….although why do they not come back into the farm straight away, occasionally they will come back as up without a re-boot but we cant carry on working like this in the environment.

 

The CMC does throw up an error code: 527 when try to select server and in the event logs we do see a Perflib event ID 1015 timeout error on the servers and event ID 257 which refers to Resource Manager unable to retrieve metrics. All servers are on the same subnet and can be pinged from and to each other

 

I have seen an article on increasing a Terminal Server timeout session but not how to actually do it…any help would be greatly appreciated!

 

Thanks in advance

 

Al

 

Alan Tropper

Server Operations

Customer Service Centre

Information and Communication Technoligies

Department of Education and Training | 151 Royal Street, East Perth WA 6004

Tel: (08) 9264 8126 or 5555 | Fax: (08) 9264 4701 | alan.tropper@det.wa.edu.au

 

 


Confidentiality and Privilege Notice
This document is intended solely for the named addressee.  The information contained in the pages is confidential and contains legally privileged information. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone, and you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you.



Confidentiality and Privilege Notice
This document is intended solely for the named addressee.  The information contained in the pages is confidential and contains legally privileged information. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone, and you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you.

[THIN] Re: Meta Xpe 1.0 servers showing as down in the CMC

Hi Jeremy,

 

Thanks for the quick reply, I will check these suggestions out.

 

I have also advised that we need to replace the current environment and we are already well under way with testing for the new XenApp 4.5 environment, however it is around a month away so I have to try to fix the current outages Im getting.

 

One last issue Im noticing on these old servers is that perfmon wont even let me add counters which is really weird????

 

Thanks for all your help with the details below, its nice that there are people like you out there to help us mortals J

 

Cheers

 

Al

 


From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jeremy Saunders
Sent: Thursday, 13 November 2008 2:51 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Meta Xpe 1.0 servers showing as down in the CMC

 

Hi Alan,

 

It sounds suspiciously like one of two issues.

1)      Memory leak or exhaustion

2)      SMB 1.0 issues

 

Issue 1 can be addressed on both W2K and W2K3 by following Microsoft TechNet article KB312362. By default, the Memory Manager tries to trim allocated paged pool memory when the system reaches 80 percent of the total paged pool. Depending on the system configuration, a possible maximum paged pool memory on a computer can be 343MB (Windows 2003 Standard) and 80 percent of this number is 274MB. If the Memory Manager is unable to trim fast enough to keep up with the demand, then you may receive event ID 2020 (The server was unable to allocate from the system paged pool because the pool was empty). But that is just one symptom.

 

By tuning the Memory Manager to start the trimming process earlier (for example, when it reaches 60 percent), it would be possible to keep up with the paged pool demand during sudden peak usage, and avoid running out of paged pool memory.

 

Microsoft will tell you that setting these values should be considered as a best practice, especially for busy servers. The optimum percentage for trimming will vary, but the default recommended setting (60%) is a good place to start.

 

[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Session Manager\Memory Management]

"PagedPoolSize"=dword:ffffffff

"PoolUsageMaximum"=dword:0000003c

 

If the paged pool memory was running close to the edge, something like a new AV engine/pattern or MS Hotfix could have pushed it over. You can use Microsoft’s poolmon to monitor this further.

 

Issue 2 can be “managed” by monitoring some perfmon counters and then tuning out the SMB parameters as per the articles listed here:

http://www.jhouseconsulting.com/index.php/blog/2008/05/15/smb-tuning/

 

If either or both the paged pool trimming and/or SMB is really busy, it may eventually recover over time, which goes close to perhaps explaining why it sometimes fixes itself without a reboot.

 

Either way, MetaFrame XP is no longer a supported product and now 4 major product releases behind.

 

Cheers,

 

Kind regards,

Jeremy Saunders

 

Senior Solution Architect - Virtualisation Specialist |  Datacom Systems WA  |  29 Oxford Close, West Leederville, WA 6007 Australia

Email: jeremy.saunders@datacom.com.au  |  Ph: +61-8-9210-0806  | Mob: +61-413-441-846  |  Fax: +61-8-9380-4226

Personal Blog: http://www.jhouseconsulting.com/index.php

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of alan tropper
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 1:43 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Meta Xpe 1.0 servers showing as down in the CMC

 

Hi,

 

I hope someone can help me, we have 20 citrix servers in our farm and they are mixed 2000 & 2003 with a couple on VM. All servers have Meta Xpe 1.0 with latest feature release and service pack.

 

However some of the servers drop off the farm during the day and also at night, once re-booted they come back into the farm and show as up and then it happens again.

 

I have tried to re-build the problem servers LHC file but the issue is still happening, the servers processor and page file don’t seem to be too busy at the point when the servers drop off resource manager. The servers themselves stop allowing new users to log on but still maintain current connections so this points to a timeout somewhere with maybe the metric or zone server not getting a response from one of our servers in time….although why do they not come back into the farm straight away, occasionally they will come back as up without a re-boot but we cant carry on working like this in the environment.

 

The CMC does throw up an error code: 527 when try to select server and in the event logs we do see a Perflib event ID 1015 timeout error on the servers and event ID 257 which refers to Resource Manager unable to retrieve metrics. All servers are on the same subnet and can be pinged from and to each other

 

I have seen an article on increasing a Terminal Server timeout session but not how to actually do it…any help would be greatly appreciated!

 

Thanks in advance

 

Al

 

Alan Tropper

Server Operations

Customer Service Centre

Information and Communication Technoligies

Department of Education and Training | 151 Royal Street, East Perth WA 6004

Tel: (08) 9264 8126 or 5555 | Fax: (08) 9264 4701 | alan.tropper@det.wa.edu.au

 

 


Confidentiality and Privilege Notice
This document is intended solely for the named addressee.  The information contained in the pages is confidential and contains legally privileged information. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone, and you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email. Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken delivery to you.