[THIN] Office XP and office 2007

Hi,

Just building a new XenApp 5.0 on 2003 sp2 we currently use Office XP but a few senior managers want to be using Office 2007,

Firstly can they both just be installed without going down either Application Isolation or streaming to the server via a profile.

Is streaming the better option?

If so is it k to install office XP normally and them stream the office 2007 install?

Any pointers in the best direction would be appreciated.

Thanks
Ronnie

Visit our website : www.ltai.ie

__________________________________________

Lufthansa Technik Airmotive Ireland Limited. Registered in Ireland. Reg. No. 45999. Registered Office: Naas Road, Rathcoole, Co.Dublin.

Lufthansa Technik Airmotive Ireland Leasing Limited. Registered in Ireland. Reg. No. 140891. Registered Office: Naas Road, Rathcoole, Co.Dublin.

__________________________________________

This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error, please advise by return email and delete all copies of the message.

 

[THIN] automated response

Greetings:

I will be out of the office on June 30 and July1, returning on July 2.

Thanks,

Rich
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
Thinlist MOBILE Feed
http://thinlist.net/mobile
************************************************

[THIN] citrix receiver windows

for fun I'm playing with this on my PXSP2 PC - installed receiver, installed XA for hosted apps plug-in 11.1.1. I can connect to published apps okay from wither my desktop (via Receiver) and from my WI, but when I connect to a published desktop it just sits there spinning... "Please wait, connecting to your desktop"

 

Any pointers?

[THIN] Re: Tracking 2003 CAL's

TS Per-User CAL's are currenly done on the "honor system". In 2003, TS Per-User CAL usage is not tracked. In 2008, TS Per-User CAL usage is tracked, but not enforced (i.e., at least you can tell when you are breaking your license agreement!)

 

There's no real easy way to tell what is going on. Your TSCAL license serve, or alternatively, your Microsoft EA agreement, ought to tell you how many TS CAL's you own. If you control access to the TS server, or the applications that are hosted on them, via something like AD group membership, you can count the number of folks in those groups and compare that to the TS CAL count. That's about as scientific as it can get with 2003. If you don't control access to your TS systems, then theoretically all of your users are potential users of TS and thus should be covered by a TS CAL, and HR can thus tell you how many you should own.

---

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Gary Scanga
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 2:15 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Tracking 2003 CAL's

Thanks again Carl.

 

To be clear, ensuring that I own enough TSCAL's for every named user is for satisfying compliance requirements and not technical requirements.  This is where the ability to track utilization would be helpful since it'd provide real data to decision makers as well as ensure that we originally sized our TSCAL's accurately.

 

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Carl Stalhood
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 1:09 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Tracking 2003 CAL's

 

User CALs are not enforced.

Device CALs are enforced.

Make sure all of your Terminal Servers are configured with Per User TS Licensing and there won't be a problem (run tscc.msc). However, you still have to ensure that you own a TSCAL for every named user that connects to Terminal Server.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Gary Scanga <Gary.Scanga@rentacenter.com> wrote:

Thanks Carl. Yes, I was asking about Per-user CAL utilization. Bummer there's no simple way to track these in 2003.

 

I'm continuing to look into managing the utilization of these CAL's because I suspect that we're running near capacity and want to know when the limit's been reached. However, based on this definition it appears that my 2003 terminal server farm may allow additional connections beyond the number of CAL's installed. So, if I have 500 CAL's configured on my 2003 terminal server license server, connection number 501 would technically be allowed. And perhaps that's a reason why tracking their utilization isn't so important as it won't negatively impact the business.

 

Can else anyone confirm this?

 

I simply want to avoid the opposite being true and connection number 500 is rejected due to a CAL limitation.

 

Thanks!

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Carl Stalhood
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:27 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Tracking 2003 CAL's

 

You mean User CALs? User CALs are tracked in 2008 but not in 2003.

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Gary Scanga <Gary.Scanga@rentacenter.com> wrote:

Does anyone have a decent way of tracking the issuance or utilization of TS CAL's in 2003?

Thanks in advance!

 

 

---

This message and any attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or otherwise be privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any review, distribution or copying of this transmittal is prohibited. If you have received this transmittal in error, please reply by e-mail and delete this message and all attachments

[THIN] Re: Tracking 2003 CAL's

Thanks again Carl.

 

To be clear, ensuring that I own enough TSCAL's for every named user is for satisfying compliance requirements and not technical requirements.  This is where the ability to track utilization would be helpful since it'd provide real data to decision makers as well as ensure that we originally sized our TSCAL's accurately.

 

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Carl Stalhood
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 1:09 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Tracking 2003 CAL's

 

User CALs are not enforced.

Device CALs are enforced.

Make sure all of your Terminal Servers are configured with Per User TS Licensing and there won't be a problem (run tscc.msc). However, you still have to ensure that you own a TSCAL for every named user that connects to Terminal Server.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Gary Scanga <Gary.Scanga@rentacenter.com> wrote:

Thanks Carl. Yes, I was asking about Per-user CAL utilization. Bummer there's no simple way to track these in 2003.

 

I'm continuing to look into managing the utilization of these CAL's because I suspect that we're running near capacity and want to know when the limit's been reached. However, based on this definition it appears that my 2003 terminal server farm may allow additional connections beyond the number of CAL's installed. So, if I have 500 CAL's configured on my 2003 terminal server license server, connection number 501 would technically be allowed. And perhaps that's a reason why tracking their utilization isn't so important as it won't negatively impact the business.

 

Can else anyone confirm this?

 

I simply want to avoid the opposite being true and connection number 500 is rejected due to a CAL limitation.

 

Thanks!

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Carl Stalhood
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:27 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Tracking 2003 CAL's

 

You mean User CALs? User CALs are tracked in 2008 but not in 2003.

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Gary Scanga <Gary.Scanga@rentacenter.com> wrote:

Does anyone have a decent way of tracking the issuance or utilization of TS CAL's in 2003?

Thanks in advance!

 

 

[THIN] Re: Tracking 2003 CAL's

User CALs are not enforced.

Device CALs are enforced.

Make sure all of your Terminal Servers are configured with Per User TS Licensing and there won't be a problem (run tscc.msc). However, you still have to ensure that you own a TSCAL for every named user that connects to Terminal Server.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 1:03 PM, Gary Scanga <Gary.Scanga@rentacenter.com> wrote:

Thanks Carl. Yes, I was asking about Per-user CAL utilization. Bummer there's no simple way to track these in 2003.

 

I'm continuing to look into managing the utilization of these CAL's because I suspect that we're running near capacity and want to know when the limit's been reached. However, based on this definition it appears that my 2003 terminal server farm may allow additional connections beyond the number of CAL's installed. So, if I have 500 CAL's configured on my 2003 terminal server license server, connection number 501 would technically be allowed. And perhaps that's a reason why tracking their utilization isn't so important as it won't negatively impact the business.

 

Can else anyone confirm this?

 

I simply want to avoid the opposite being true and connection number 500 is rejected due to a CAL limitation.

 

Thanks!

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Carl Stalhood
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:27 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Tracking 2003 CAL's

 

You mean User CALs? User CALs are tracked in 2008 but not in 2003.

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Gary Scanga <Gary.Scanga@rentacenter.com> wrote:

Does anyone have a decent way of tracking the issuance or utilization of TS CAL's in 2003?

Thanks in advance!

 

[THIN] Re: Tracking 2003 CAL's

Thanks Carl. Yes, I was asking about Per-user CAL utilization. Bummer there's no simple way to track these in 2003.

 

I'm continuing to look into managing the utilization of these CAL's because I suspect that we're running near capacity and want to know when the limit's been reached. However, based on this definition it appears that my 2003 terminal server farm may allow additional connections beyond the number of CAL's installed. So, if I have 500 CAL's configured on my 2003 terminal server license server, connection number 501 would technically be allowed. And perhaps that's a reason why tracking their utilization isn't so important as it won't negatively impact the business.

 

Can else anyone confirm this?

 

I simply want to avoid the opposite being true and connection number 500 is rejected due to a CAL limitation.

 

Thanks!

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Carl Stalhood
Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2009 9:27 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Tracking 2003 CAL's

 

You mean User CALs? User CALs are tracked in 2008 but not in 2003.

On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 11:24 PM, Gary Scanga <Gary.Scanga@rentacenter.com> wrote:

Does anyone have a decent way of tracking the issuance or utilization of TS CAL's in 2003?

Thanks in advance!

 

[THIN] Re: Java dialog boxes

Andrew,

The application doesn't work at all in Firefox.

I can't even get to the point where the Java applet launches.  The menu within the application don't do anything in Firefox.

Thanks,

Tony

"Andrew Wood" <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> Sent by: thin-bounce@freelists.org 06/29/2009 11:38 AM Please respond to thin@freelists.org

To <thin@freelists.org> cc Subject [THIN] Re: Java dialog boxes

Do you get the same issue if you run it with firefox?
 
From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Anthony_Baldwin@mhsnr.org
Sent: 29 June 2009 16:14
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Java dialog boxes
 

All,

Having an issue with a homegrown Java applet that keeps hanging Internet Explorer on our Citrix boxes.

Seems the Java applet is trying to popup a modal dialog box that somehow gets behind the IE window.  We got this from looking at the threads from a process dump of a hung IE instance.

The user can cause the hang pretty consistently by Alt-tabbing between seamless Citrix windows on her desktop quickly.

We're running Citrix 4.0/Windows 2003/IE6 on these servers.

Here's what we've tried so far...

• Update the JRE configuration to disable DirectDraw support
• Upgrade Citrix client to the latest version (version 11)
• Disabled all IE Add-ons, except Java
• Toggle the "Force offscreen compositing even under Terminal Server" setting in IE
• Force the Citrix published application into windowed mode (TWIMode=off)
• Cleaned out the published browser's cache
• Upgraded Java on Citrix server (from 1.5.0_05 to 1.6.0_11)
• Set the SeemlessFlags registry entry to 0x00027fb6

So far nothing has helped.

Anyone, have any other ideas?

Thanks,

Tony
 
 
 
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This message, including any attachments, is for
the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and
privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution
is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the
sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

   CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This message, including any attachments, is for  the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and  privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution  is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the  sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 

[THIN] Re: Java dialog boxes

Do you get the same issue if you run it with firefox?

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Anthony_Baldwin@mhsnr.org
Sent: 29 June 2009 16:14
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Java dialog boxes

 

All,

Having an issue with a homegrown Java applet that keeps hanging Internet Explorer on our Citrix boxes.

Seems the Java applet is trying to popup a modal dialog box that somehow gets behind the IE window.  We got this from looking at the threads from a process dump of a hung IE instance.

The user can cause the hang pretty consistently by Alt-tabbing between seamless Citrix windows on her desktop quickly.

We're running Citrix 4.0/Windows 2003/IE6 on these servers.

Here's what we've tried so far...

• Update the JRE configuration to disable DirectDraw support
• Upgrade Citrix client to the latest version (version 11)
• Disabled all IE Add-ons, except Java
• Toggle the "Force offscreen compositing even under Terminal Server" setting in IE
• Force the Citrix published application into windowed mode (TWIMode=off)
• Cleaned out the published browser's cache
• Upgraded Java on Citrix server (from 1.5.0_05 to 1.6.0_11)
• Set the SeemlessFlags registry entry to 0x00027fb6

So far nothing has helped.

Anyone, have any other ideas?

Thanks,

Tony

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This message, including any attachments, is for 

the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and 

privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution 

is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 

sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.

[THIN] Java dialog boxes

All,

Having an issue with a homegrown Java applet that keeps hanging Internet Explorer on our Citrix boxes.

Seems the Java applet is trying to popup a modal dialog box that somehow gets behind the IE window.  We got this from looking at the threads from a process dump of a hung IE instance.

The user can cause the hang pretty consistently by Alt-tabbing between seamless Citrix windows on her desktop quickly.

We're running Citrix 4.0/Windows 2003/IE6 on these servers.

Here's what we've tried so far...

• Update the JRE configuration to disable DirectDraw support
• Upgrade Citrix client to the latest version (version 11)
• Disabled all IE Add-ons, except Java
• Toggle the "Force offscreen compositing even under Terminal Server" setting in IE
• Force the Citrix published application into windowed mode (TWIMode=off)
• Cleaned out the published browser's cache
• Upgraded Java on Citrix server (from 1.5.0_05 to 1.6.0_11)
• Set the SeemlessFlags registry entry to 0x00027fb6

So far nothing has helped.

Anyone, have any other ideas?

Thanks,

Tony

   CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:  This message, including any attachments, is for  the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and  privileged information.  Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution  is prohibited.  If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the  sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. 

[THIN] Re: Is there free XenServer training?

I’ve been very disappointed with Citrix’ online training.  If it’s free and not required for certification then Citix can do whatever they want.  But for the most part, this is not real training it’s an exercise in marketing.

 

Joe

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Burke, Paul
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 6:10 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Is there free XenServer training?

 

Greetings,

 

For anyone considering giving it a go, be warned that it is approximately 6 hours long and audio-less, meaning you have one hell of a lot of reading to do if you try and complete it in a day. I booked last Friday working from home in order to undertake it and actually fell asleep for 15 mins during the latter stages!  :-)

 

As to its structure, I would class it as average. It’s delivery is very much in a PowerPoint presentation style, though there’s access to a table of contents which allows you to move around the various sections at will. The imitation hands-on sections are pretty noddy and the majority of the information that it imparts can most certainly be found in the manuals. Also, a large percentage of the course is based around the purchasable “extras”, so anyone looking to use it as a good introduction to the XenServer hypervisor will undoubtedly be disappointed. If it’s information on the extras that you’re after though, it does a fine job of covering them in detail.

 

Just my 2p worth.

 

Thanks to John for posting the original link to this course.

 

Regards,

 

Paul

 

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of John Elstone
Sent: 23 June 2009 14:42
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Is there free XenServer training?

 

 

2009/6/23 Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@gmail.com>

Or a decent guide for newbies for XenServer?  No the admin guide is not the answer I'm looking for :)

http://www.citrixtraining.com/courses/course_view.cfm/course_id:274/cgroup_id:30

CEX-100-1W

Introducing Citrix Essentials for XenServer 5.5

Self-paced Online

Description      

Special offer- this course is available at no cost for a limited time!  Registration fees will be waived at time of registration.

This course introduces learners to Citrix XenServer 5.5 and Citrix Essentials for XenServer 5.5 and provides the knowledge needed to perform basic configuration and management tasks. Through online simulations, learners will view, install and configure key product features, as well as explore capabilities such as StorageLink, Workload Balancing and Lab Manager

 

[THIN] Re: Is there free XenServer training?

Greetings,

 

For anyone considering giving it a go, be warned that it is approximately 6 hours long and audio-less, meaning you have one hell of a lot of reading to do if you try and complete it in a day. I booked last Friday working from home in order to undertake it and actually fell asleep for 15 mins during the latter stages!  :-)

 

As to its structure, I would class it as average. It’s delivery is very much in a PowerPoint presentation style, though there’s access to a table of contents which allows you to move around the various sections at will. The imitation hands-on sections are pretty noddy and the majority of the information that it imparts can most certainly be found in the manuals. Also, a large percentage of the course is based around the purchasable “extras”, so anyone looking to use it as a good introduction to the XenServer hypervisor will undoubtedly be disappointed. If it’s information on the extras that you’re after though, it does a fine job of covering them in detail.

 

Just my 2p worth.

 

Thanks to John for posting the original link to this course.

 

Regards,

 

Paul

 

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of John Elstone
Sent: 23 June 2009 14:42
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Is there free XenServer training?

 

 

2009/6/23 Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@gmail.com>

Or a decent guide for newbies for XenServer?  No the admin guide is not the answer I'm looking for :)

http://www.citrixtraining.com/courses/course_view.cfm/course_id:274/cgroup_id:30

CEX-100-1W

Introducing Citrix Essentials for XenServer 5.5

Self-paced Online

Description      

Special offer- this course is available at no cost for a limited time!  Registration fees will be waived at time of registration.

This course introduces learners to Citrix XenServer 5.5 and Citrix Essentials for XenServer 5.5 and provides the knowledge needed to perform basic configuration and management tasks. Through online simulations, learners will view, install and configure key product features, as well as explore capabilities such as StorageLink, Workload Balancing and Lab Manager

 

[THIN] Re: Any problems with running Office 2003 and Outlook 2007 on Win2003 and PS 4.5?

No issues on PS 4.0/Win 2003 for my farm for over a year now. Just
install Office 2003 full 1st, then Outlook 2007 only, choosing the
upgrade option (which will remove Outlook 2003). *Tip* Install Office
2007 SP2 as it really speeds up Outlook 2007.
-Matt

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Richard Waters<Richard.Waters@utah.edu> wrote:
>
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://www.freelists.org/list/thin
Follow ThinList on Twitter
http://twitter.com/thinlist
Thin List discussion is now available in blog format at:
http://thinmaillist.blogspot.com
Thinlist MOBILE Feed
http://thinlist.net/mobile
************************************************

[THIN] Re: Citrix UPD - direct or indirect

Direct requires print drivers on the Citrix server.

Indirect can use the UPD, which is RAW and compressed. However, if the print server is in the head office then the print job will traverse the WAN circuit multiple times.

If the print job sizes are excessive as they traverse the WAN, consider ThinPrint or WAN Optimization.

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 5:14 AM, Angela Smith <angela_smith9@hotmail.com> wrote:

Hi

I have a centralised Print Server in our Head Office with our Citrix Servers.  We have users in branches that Print to their local Printers.  Jobs spool over a 2Mb WAN Link.  Should I be printing with direct or indirect Policy setting?  We do not have local Print Servers.  We use 1 Print Server in Head Office.  We use Universal Printing only as set in Citrix Policy.

Thanks
Ang

---

Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to rent, share or buy this winter?

[THIN] Citrix UPD - direct or indirect

Hi

I have a centralised Print Server in our Head Office with our Citrix Servers.  We have users in branches that Print to their local Printers.  Jobs spool over a 2Mb WAN Link.  Should I be printing with direct or indirect Policy setting?  We do not have local Print Servers.  We use 1 Print Server in Head Office.  We use Universal Printing only as set in Citrix Policy.

Thanks
Ang

---

Find your next place with Ninemsn property Looking for a place to rent, share or buy this winter?

[THIN] Re: The dreaded "Applying Internet Explorer Branding Policy" delay...

Thanks – worked a treat.

 

We had the hotfix, but it wasn’t enabled via the registry entry.

 

Cheers.

 

Regards

Nik Hunt
IT Services Manager
BM Polyco Ltd

Tel: 020 8443 9044 | Fax: 020 8443 9002 | Mob: 07917 461 977 | E-Mail: nik.hunt@polyco.co.uk
Crown Road, Enfield, Middlesex, EN1 1TX
Registered in England No 1368213
www.polyco.co.uk
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Carl Stalhood
Sent: 26 June 2009 13:25
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: The dreaded "Applying Internet Explorer Branding Policy" delay...

 

Have you tried this: http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX120579?

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:45 AM, IT Support <it@polyco.co.uk> wrote:

Hi All,

 

We’ve been getting this for some time on our citrix farm – (W2K3 R2 32-Bit / Citrix 4.5) latest service packs and roll up packs etc.

 

I’ve been fixing it by replacing iedkcs32.dll with a previous version, but this gets overwritten every time you apply service packs.

 

In any case, I don’t like having out of date DLLs on the system – Microsoft have obviously updated them for a reason.

 

Does anyone know of a permanent fix?

Regards

Nik Hunt
IT Services Manager
BM Polyco Ltd

Tel: 020 8443 9044 | Fax: 020 8443 9002 | Mob: 07917 461 977 | E-Mail: nik.hunt@polyco.co.uk
Crown Road, Enfield, Middlesex, EN1 1TX
Registered in England No 1368213
www.polyco.co.uk
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

BM Polyco Ltd Disclaimer

This e-mail and the information it contains are confidential. If you have received this message in error please notify us immediately. You should not use or copy it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other party. The contents of this communication are advisory and are not binding on the Company unless supported by authorised documentation.
This e-mail has been scanned for content by Websense Hosted Email Security.

BM Polyco Ltd Disclaimer
This e-mail and the information it contains are confidential. If you have received this message in error please notify us immediately. You should not use or copy it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other party. The contents of this communication are advisory and are not binding on the Company unless supported by authorised documentation.
It has also passed through the MailControl Anti-Virus service powered by BlackSpider for total peace of mind. 

Click here to report this email as spam.

[THIN] Re: Is there free XenServer training?

You will have to take the test for the certification.

 

Joe

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of ananth padmanabham
Sent: Sunday, June 28, 2009 8:57 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Is there free XenServer training?

 

Hey, I have completed successfully. Do i get any certificate from Citrix ? Anantha Padmanabham K --- On Wed, 24/6/09, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote: From: Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> Subject: [THIN] Re: Is there free XenServer training? To: thin@freelists.org Date: Wednesday, 24 June, 2009, 3:20 AM Ah well – we both learn something J   From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch Sent: 23 June 2009 17:50 To: thin@freelists.org Subject: [THIN] Re: Is there free XenServer training?   Definitely does not have what I'm looking for.  Oh well, worth a shot. On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@gmail.com> wrote: I stand corrected.  :)    but does it have the basic stuff in it?  I suppose I shall have to find out. On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote: Citrix Essentials isn't a "separate product" per se its simply XenServer with the "extra bits" that you pay for so the Seamless Storage Integration, Dynamic Provisioning etc. You still need to learn about the XenServer stuff and that's still in the course isn't it?   So, you should get the XenServer training ..and then some – you could always just stop when it gets to the non-free stuff J   From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch Sent: 23 June 2009 15:30 To: thin@freelists.org Subject: [THIN] Re: Is there free XenServer training?   thanks John but that's a separate product.  I need XenServer by itself right now which that site doesn't seem to have anything for basic XenServer right now.   Webster, I may take you up on that..... On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:42 AM, John Elstone <jelstone@gmail.com> wrote:   2009/6/23 Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@gmail.com>   Or a decent guide for newbies for XenServer?  No the admin guide is not the answer I'm looking for :) http://www.citrixtraining.com/courses/course_view.cfm/course_id:274/cgroup_id:30 CEX-100-1W Introducing Citrix Essentials for XenServer 5.5 Self-paced Online Description       Special offer- this course is available at no cost for a limited time!  Registration fees will be waived at time of registration. This course introduces learners to Citrix XenServer 5.5 and Citrix Essentials for XenServer 5.5 and provides the knowledge needed to perform basic configuration and management tasks. Through online simulations, learners will view, install and configure key product features, as well as explore capabilities such as StorageLink, Workload Balancing and Lab Manager

 

---

Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Click here.

[THIN] Re: Is there free XenServer training?

Hey, I have completed successfully. Do i get any certificate from Citrix ? Anantha Padmanabham K --- On Wed, 24/6/09, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote: From: Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> Subject: [THIN] Re: Is there free XenServer training? To: thin@freelists.org Date: Wednesday, 24 June, 2009, 3:20 AM Ah well – we both learn something J   From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch Sent: 23 June 2009 17:50 To: thin@freelists.org Subject: [THIN] Re: Is there free XenServer training?   Definitely does not have what I'm looking for.  Oh well, worth a shot. On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@gmail.com> wrote: I stand corrected.  :)    but does it have the basic stuff in it?  I suppose I shall have to find out. On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 11:40 AM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@gilwood-cs.co.uk> wrote: Citrix Essentials isn't a "separate product" per se its simply XenServer with the "extra bits" that you pay for so the Seamless Storage Integration, Dynamic Provisioning etc. You still need to learn about the XenServer stuff and that's still in the course isn't it?   So, you should get the XenServer training ..and then some – you could always just stop when it gets to the non-free stuff J   From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch Sent: 23 June 2009 15:30 To: thin@freelists.org Subject: [THIN] Re: Is there free XenServer training?   thanks John but that's a separate product.  I need XenServer by itself right now which that site doesn't seem to have anything for basic XenServer right now.   Webster, I may take you up on that..... On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 9:42 AM, John Elstone <jelstone@gmail.com> wrote:   2009/6/23 Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@gmail.com>   Or a decent guide for newbies for XenServer?  No the admin guide is not the answer I'm looking for :) http://www.citrixtraining.com/courses/course_view.cfm/course_id:274/cgroup_id:30 CEX-100-1W Introducing Citrix Essentials for XenServer 5.5 Self-paced Online Description       Special offer- this course is available at no cost for a limited time!  Registration fees will be waived at time of registration. This course introduces learners to Citrix XenServer 5.5 and Citrix Essentials for XenServer 5.5 and provides the knowledge needed to perform basic configuration and management tasks. Through online simulations, learners will view, install and configure key product features, as well as explore capabilities such as StorageLink, Workload Balancing and Lab Manager

---

Love Cricket? Check out live scores, photos, video highlights and more. Click here.

[THIN] Any problems with running Office 2003 and Outlook 2007 on Win2003 and PS 4.5?

 

[THIN] Re: Tips for installing Adobe CS2 products?

Thanks, unfortunately, it’s not an option right now.  Plus, these users just use them from time to time – they are not using them all day every day.

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Joe Shonk
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 2:21 PM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Re: Tips for installing Adobe CS2 products?

 

XenDesktop would be better way to go for these type of apps.

 

Joe

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Richard Waters
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 9:31 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Tips for installing Adobe CS2 products?

 

I have been tasked with installing Adobe Photoshop CS2, Dreamweaver CS2, and InDesign CS2 on a couple of Citrix servers today.  They are running Windows 2003 with Presentation Server 4.5.

 

Does anyone have any tips for running these successfully in this environment?

[THIN] Re: Tips for installing Adobe CS2 products?

XenDesktop would be better way to go for these type of apps.

 

Joe

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Richard Waters
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 9:31 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] Tips for installing Adobe CS2 products?

 

I have been tasked with installing Adobe Photoshop CS2, Dreamweaver CS2, and InDesign CS2 on a couple of Citrix servers today.  They are running Windows 2003 with Presentation Server 4.5.

 

Does anyone have any tips for running these successfully in this environment?

[THIN] Re: Tips for installing Adobe CS2 products?

nope, other than they're per-seat licensing just like M$ products. i.e., you need a license for every seat that connects to your farm to be legal, could be expensive.

On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 4:31 AM, Richard Waters <Richard.Waters@utah.edu> wrote:

I have been tasked with installing Adobe Photoshop CS2, Dreamweaver CS2, and InDesign CS2 on a couple of Citrix servers today.  They are running Windows 2003 with Presentation Server 4.5.

 

Does anyone have any tips for running these successfully in this environment?

[THIN] Re: XenApp 4.5 - 32bit or 64bit?

Big benefits as memory can be addressed nativly vs the magic 32 bit OS’s have to do. You get at least a two fold increase in sessions what can be supported vs X32 .

 

We have been running x64 with 4.0 for 2 years using Screwdrivers 4.  Pretty darn stable.

 

 

Bill

 

 

 

From: thin-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:thin-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Angela Smith
Sent: Friday, June 26, 2009 2:39 AM
To: thin@freelists.org
Subject: [THIN] XenApp 4.5 - 32bit or 64bit?

 

Hi

Im about to build a new farm based on Windows 2003/XenApp 5.  Im not sure if I should use 32bit or 64bit for the OS.  80% of our Applications are Web Based.  The others such as Office 2003 do not come in 64bit.

Is there any benefit in using 64bit Windows 2003 for mainly web based Apps?  Also is there any benefit in using 64bit for Web Interface servers?

Thanks
Ang

---

Click here to find out more POP access for Hotmail is here!

Privacy Notice: This electronic mail message, and any attachments, are confidential and are intended for  the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain information that is proprietary and that may be  Individually Identifiable or Protected Health Information under HIPAA. If you are not the intended  recipient, please immediately contact the sender by telephone, or by email, and destroy all copies of this message. If you are a regular recipient of our electronic mail, please notify us promptly if you change  your email address. 

[THIN] Tips for installing Adobe CS2 products?

I have been tasked with installing Adobe Photoshop CS2, Dreamweaver CS2, and InDesign CS2 on a couple of Citrix servers today.  They are running Windows 2003 with Presentation Server 4.5.

 

Does anyone have any tips for running these successfully in this environment?

[THIN] Re: The dreaded "Applying Internet Explorer Branding Policy" delay...

Have you tried this: http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX120579?

On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 3:45 AM, IT Support <it@polyco.co.uk> wrote:

Hi All,

 

We've been getting this for some time on our citrix farm – (W2K3 R2 32-Bit / Citrix 4.5) latest service packs and roll up packs etc.

 

I've been fixing it by replacing iedkcs32.dll with a previous version, but this gets overwritten every time you apply service packs.

 

In any case, I don't like having out of date DLLs on the system – Microsoft have obviously updated them for a reason.

 

Does anyone know of a permanent fix?

Regards

Nik Hunt
IT Services Manager
BM Polyco Ltd

Tel: 020 8443 9044 | Fax: 020 8443 9002 | Mob: 07917 461 977 | E-Mail: nik.hunt@polyco.co.uk
Crown Road, Enfield, Middlesex, EN1 1TX
Registered in England No 1368213
www.polyco.co.uk
P Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

BM Polyco Ltd Disclaimer

This e-mail and the information it contains are confidential. If you have received this message in error please notify us immediately. You should not use or copy it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other party. The contents of this communication are advisory and are not binding on the Company unless supported by authorised documentation.
This e-mail has been scanned for content by Websense Hosted Email Security.

BM Polyco Ltd Disclaimer
This e-mail and the information it contains are confidential. If you have received this message in error please notify us immediately. You should not use or copy it for any purpose nor disclose its contents to any other party. The contents of this communication are advisory and are not binding on the Company unless supported by authorised documentation.
It has also passed through the MailControl Anti-Virus service powered by BlackSpider for total peace of mind.